[EC-NCSG] Updates & prepare for Dublin meeting

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Rudi,

to clarify here, I raised this point in several EC confcalls , and few
weeks ago I already indicated that I would come back with some updates (
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG+ExComm+Meeting+Minutes?preview=/52891517/56142777/NCSG%20EC%20Minutes_02_10_15.docx
)

Rafik


2015-10-14 19:51 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:

> As a member of the NCSG-EC I?m a bit surprised we never had a thoughtful
> and profound discussion about the use of membership tools for our
> stakeholder group and constituencies. Each will certainly have specific
> requirements and objectives. The requirements to become a member in each of
> the groups is different and thus requires appropriate processes and
> adequate tools to manage.
>
> Why has this never been on the agenda of the NCSG-EC ? Aside the approval
> of members, which took always too much time, nothing has ever been
> discussed allowing to avoid the waste of time on membership approval
> processes.
>
> I hope the next NCSG-EC will take care of these issues and have a
> transparant process on what affects immediately the working elements of the
> SG and its constituencies.
>
> See you in Dublin,
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
> www.npoc.org
>
> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>
>
>
> Op 14 okt. 2015, om 12:29 heeft Tapani Tarvainen <
> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Oct 14 09:18, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> few months ago, I asked Maryam to do some research about civicrm as option
> for membership management and about hosting option. if she can find that
> document, she can share it and we can use it as strawman for discussion too
>
>
> That sounds like it could be very useful. Maryam?
>
> my comment about such solution is the about effort and time to spend on
> customisation and maintenance.
>
>
> That is indeed a good point.
>
> Note though that even a pure commercial solution like
> Memberclicks will require time for customization and work
> on our part as well - if you look at the timeline slide,
> some of the tasks where responsible party is "ORG ID" (us)
> may not turn out to be quite as easy as they seem.
>
> On the otherhand it is possible to buy support for CiviCRM
> customization and maintenance as well. I don't know if
> Maryam's research went as far as identifying companies
> and their ability to do necessary customization and
> migration work for us, but I'd like to have some kind
> of review of options, possibly even asking for proposals.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20151014/97da6659/attachment.html>