From rafik.dammak  Wed Jan  7 02:42:14 2015
From: rafik.dammak (Rafik Dammak)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:42:14 +0900
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Fwd: NCPH Intersessional Meeting Pl -- proposal for
	discussion
In-Reply-To: <E5B4A2ED43DFAE4F9E710FA54FEF8F6229AD6DE6@LAEX02.MSK.local>
References: <E5B4A2ED43DFAE4F9E710FA54FEF8F6229AD6DE6@LAEX02.MSK.local>
Message-ID: <CAH5sThmHMSKuvUpsRRME7455qU6MRM68mRnKp8+cDiBy9pzN+Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi everyone,

proposals from CSG with the regard to next week meeting.
I am happy with proposal #2, I would even be tempted to have regular
confcall with them between ICANN meetings if it helps to discuss some
topics. for proposal #1 , I think that is not far from what discussed
previously about rotation but looking for your input here.

on other side, is there any proposal we want to put on table with the
regard to NCPH internal matters?

Thanks,

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com>
Date: 2015-01-07 9:23 GMT+09:00
Subject: NCPH Intersessional Meeting Pl -- proposal for discussion
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, William Drake <
william.drake at uzh.ch>, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>, "
lori.schulman at ascd.org" <lori.schulman at ascd.org>, Kristina Rosette <
krosette at cov.com>, "rudi.vansnick at isoc.be" <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>, Elisa
Cooper <Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com>, Jimson Olufuye <
jolufuye at kontemporary.net>, Stefania Milan <Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>, Marilyn
Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>


 Fellow Non-contracted party house leaders,



As discussed during some of our planning calls for the NCPH intersessional
meeting, our discussion of ?In-House? issues regarding the functioning of
our House and the fulfillment of its responsibilities could be facilitated
by having some concrete proposals on the table prior to our arrival in
Washington.

 In that spirit, and with the endorsement of the Commercial Stakeholder
Group executive committee, I offer the following proposals for your
consideration, and for discussion both via e-mail prior to the
intersessional meeting and during our face to face discussion in
Washington, currently scheduled for next Monday morning (?slot C?).  Please
feel free to share these proposals with your colleagues as appropriate.

1.  *Selection of GNSO Council Vice Chair*: We propose to replace the
current ad hoc selection system with the following:  The privilege to
nominate a candidate for Vice Chair should be rotated annually between the
two Stakeholder Groups.  Since a counselor from the non-commercial side
(David Cake) has been selected each of the past two years, we propose that
the commercial side exercise this privilege in 2015, non-commercial in
2016.  For election, the nominee would have to win an absolute majority of
votes (currently 7) including at least one vote from each stakeholder
group, in a ?nominee v. none of the above? poll.  (The NCA appointee to our
house would continue to be eligible to vote.)  Both sides would commit not
to reject the nominee of the other side other than for compelling reasons
that are communicated in advance to the other side.  Finally, we would set
the clear expectation that the vice chair would keep both sides of the
House informed of relevant activities within the Council, including by
meeting with each side of the House upon request, at least once each
calendar quarter.

2.  *?Hard-wiring? House leadership meeting into ICANN meeting schedule*:
We propose that both sides agree that, at each ICANN public meeting
(beginning with Buenos Aires) , a one-hour slot will be reserved for a
meeting of leadership of the groups making up the House, to discuss current
issues of mutual concern. (If there is mutual agreement and it is
logistically feasible, this slot could be made into a broader meeting of
House participants attending the ICANN meeting.)  Agenda for the meeting
would be negotiated in advance among the groups, and the meeting would be
recorded and transcribed for those members of the groups unable to attend.

These proposals are made in the context of the existing structure of the
NCPH (and of the Council as a whole), and could require adjustment if those
structures change.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of these proposals.  I look
forward to your comments and reactions.

Steve Metalitz, IPC Vice President
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150107/fb801e40/attachment.html>


From avri  Wed Jan  7 03:44:45 2015
From: avri (avri doria)
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:44:45 -0500
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Fwd: NCPH Intersessional Meeting Pl -- proposal
	for	discussion
Message-ID: <r8990v42adma8vo7m6vljbty.1420595085695@email.android.com>


Hi,

One is pretty much the method that was established several years ago. Then it was only for 2 cycles. Then they wanted to abrogate it and we went into so-called ad hoc mode. Sure let's do this until they decided they don't want to anymore. Like when we pick someone they don't want.

And if the leadership wants to meet for an hour per meeting and you want to formalize it, no big deal.

avri

Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> </div><div>Date:01/06/2015  7:42 PM  (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: NCSG-Policy <PC-NCSG at ipjustice.org>, ec-ncsg at ipjustice.org </div><div>Cc:  </div><div>Subject: [EC-NCSG] Fwd: NCPH Intersessional Meeting Pl -- proposal for	discussion </div><div>
</div>Hi everyone,

proposals from CSG with the regard to next week meeting.
I am happy with proposal #2, I would even be tempted to have regular confcall with them between ICANN meetings if it helps to discuss some topics. for proposal #1 , I think that is not far from what discussed previously about rotation but looking for your input here.

on other side, is there any proposal we want to put on table with the regard to NCPH internal matters?

Thanks,

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com>
Date: 2015-01-07 9:23 GMT+09:00
Subject: NCPH Intersessional Meeting Pl -- proposal for discussion
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>, "lori.schulman at ascd.org" <lori.schulman at ascd.org>, Kristina Rosette <krosette at cov.com>, "rudi.vansnick at isoc.be" <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>, Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com>, Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye at kontemporary.net>, Stefania Milan <Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>


Fellow Non-contracted party house leaders,

 

As discussed during some of our planning calls for the NCPH intersessional meeting, our discussion of ?In-House? issues regarding the functioning of our House and the fulfillment of its responsibilities could be facilitated by having some concrete proposals on the table prior to our arrival in Washington.

 In that spirit, and with the endorsement of the Commercial Stakeholder Group executive committee, I offer the following proposals for your consideration, and for discussion both via e-mail prior to the intersessional meeting and during our face to face discussion in Washington, currently scheduled for next Monday morning (?slot C?).  Please feel free to share these proposals with your colleagues as appropriate.

1.  Selection of GNSO Council Vice Chair: We propose to replace the current ad hoc selection system with the following:  The privilege to nominate a candidate for Vice Chair should be rotated annually between the two Stakeholder Groups.  Since a counselor from the non-commercial side (David Cake) has been selected each of the past two years, we propose that the commercial side exercise this privilege in 2015, non-commercial in 2016.  For election, the nominee would have to win an absolute majority of votes (currently 7) including at least one vote from each stakeholder group, in a ?nominee v. none of the above? poll.  (The NCA appointee to our house would continue to be eligible to vote.)  Both sides would commit not to reject the nominee of the other side other than for compelling reasons that are communicated in advance to the other side.  Finally, we would set the clear expectation that the vice chair would keep both sides of the House informed of relevant activities within the Council, including by meeting with each side of the House upon request, at least once each  calendar quarter.

2.  ?Hard-wiring? House leadership meeting into ICANN meeting schedule:  We propose that both sides agree that, at each ICANN public meeting (beginning with Buenos Aires) , a one-hour slot will be reserved for a meeting of leadership of the groups making  up the House, to discuss current issues of mutual concern. (If there is mutual agreement and it is logistically feasible, this slot could be made into a broader meeting of House participants attending the ICANN meeting.)  Agenda for the meeting would be negotiated in advance among the groups, and the meeting would be recorded and transcribed for those members of the groups unable to attend.

These proposals are made in the context of the existing structure of the NCPH (and of the Council as a whole), and could require adjustment if those structures change.   

Thank you in advance for your consideration of these proposals.  I look forward to your comments and reactions. 

Steve Metalitz, IPC Vice President   

 

 

 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150106/ff35b930/attachment-0001.html>


From rafik.dammak  Mon Jan 26 03:13:46 2015
From: rafik.dammak (Rafik Dammak)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:13:46 +0900
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Next EC meeting & action items
Message-ID: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi everyone,

First let me welcome Tapani as the new NCUC representative to the NCSG
replacing Milton. I want to thank Milton for his 4 years in the EC with us,
you will be missed!

Second, I am listing some actions items for the EC:
- next EC call: as agreed we should have our EC call in the last friday of
the month. However for this time we also have a 1 hour meeting in Singapore.

Lori is not able to come to Singapore and I am not sure for Tapani. So can
we use that session for applications review or shall we postpone the review
to ad hoc call in 20th february, to give you more time to go through the
applications. We can use the Singapore session for some strategic planning
for this year.

- Regarding the applications review please check the spreadsheets:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dENsT21PLTFmeW9qZ2pLLWowc3RTbmc#gid=6
 &
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ane1uzL43HhedDFhOWZOTEVhMzZUYUszVFhpX1JEU1E#gid=0



@Tapani if you agree we can have short call to explain how we proceed for
the review so you can catch up.

- We still have some material to review and need EC members input:

   -  link to a mockup of membership application form:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1uPzS7nxQkGgndirN8JM_E067DXz42uXWKcBClxAd4KY/edit
I shared it previously and resending it here. we discussed during the call
about some info to ask to individuals e.g to highlight their
"non-commercialness". also improving the form such as with mail
notification when we receive new application .
@Lori please check if you have the full access and see the whole form in a
single page.


   - process flowchart draft: I instructed Maryam to draft one so we can
   post it in the application page to clarify to applicants about the process
   and expectations in term of time response. we are trying to improve the
   review period , by having our regular call by the last friday of each
   month. I will send soon the new applications and also list of pending
   applications to which we need to make final decision.


   -  Maryam created a logo for NCSG and that can be good for NCSG
   branding. she followed the ICANN graphic guidelines but we should make our
   own changes.


   - ICANN will support us to have flyers before ICANN meetings, we won't
   make it for singapore but at least we got a draft  to start with. please
   share your ideas and suggestions


Best Regards,

Rafik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/a53135c0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSG Flyer.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 2165711 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/a53135c0/attachment-0002.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NGSC_Logo.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 856534 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/a53135c0/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSG Membership Application and Approval Process v1.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 107014 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/a53135c0/attachment-0003.docx>


From rudi.vansnick  Mon Jan 26 10:10:58 2015
From: rudi.vansnick (Rudi Vansnick)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:10:58 +0100
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Next EC meeting & action items
In-Reply-To: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6E07CF28-719D-4CFB-A4DE-95B089E94C5B@isoc.be>

Hi Rafik,

Can you provide de flyer in pdf format ? As I?m not using microsoft office the .docx looks a bit weird when viewed with libreoffice.

Kind regards,

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>

rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32



> Op 26-jan.-2015, om 02:13 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> First let me welcome Tapani as the new NCUC representative to the NCSG replacing Milton. I want to thank Milton for his 4 years in the EC with us, you will be missed!
> 
> Second, I am listing some actions items for the EC:
> - next EC call: as agreed we should have our EC call in the last friday of the month. However for this time we also have a 1 hour meeting in Singapore.
> 
> Lori is not able to come to Singapore and I am not sure for Tapani. So can we use that session for applications review or shall we postpone the review to ad hoc call in 20th february, to give you more time to go through the applications. We can use the Singapore session for some strategic planning for this year.
> 
> - Regarding the applications review please check the spreadsheets: 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dENsT21PLTFmeW9qZ2pLLWowc3RTbmc#gid=6 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dENsT21PLTFmeW9qZ2pLLWowc3RTbmc#gid=6> & https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ane1uzL43HhedDFhOWZOTEVhMzZUYUszVFhpX1JEU1E#gid=0 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ane1uzL43HhedDFhOWZOTEVhMzZUYUszVFhpX1JEU1E#gid=0>  
> 
> 
> @Tapani if you agree we can have short call to explain how we proceed for the review so you can catch up.
> 
> - We still have some material to review and need EC members input: 
> 
>  link to a mockup of membership application form:
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1uPzS7nxQkGgndirN8JM_E067DXz42uXWKcBClxAd4KY/edit <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1uPzS7nxQkGgndirN8JM_E067DXz42uXWKcBClxAd4KY/edit>
> I shared it previously and resending it here. we discussed during the call about some info to ask to individuals e.g to highlight their "non-commercialness". also improving the form such as with mail notification when we receive new application .
> @Lori please check if you have the full access and see the whole form in a single page.
> 
> process flowchart draft: I instructed Maryam to draft one so we can post it in the application page to clarify to applicants about the process and expectations in term of time response. we are trying to improve the review period , by having our regular call by the last friday of each month. I will send soon the new applications and also list of pending applications to which we need to make final decision.
>  Maryam created a logo for NCSG and that can be good for NCSG branding. she followed the ICANN graphic guidelines but we should make our own changes.
> ICANN will support us to have flyers before ICANN meetings, we won't make it for singapore but at least we got a draft  to start with. please share your ideas and suggestions
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> <NCSG Flyer.docx><NGSC_Logo.pdf><NCSG Membership Application and Approval Process v1.docx>_______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/955bbda3/attachment.html>


From rafik.dammak  Mon Jan 26 10:15:58 2015
From: rafik.dammak (Rafik Dammak)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:15:58 +0900
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Next EC meeting & action items
In-Reply-To: <6E07CF28-719D-4CFB-A4DE-95B089E94C5B@isoc.be>
References: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6E07CF28-719D-4CFB-A4DE-95B089E94C5B@isoc.be>
Message-ID: <CAH5sTh=M0hvs8jWX1Lm1CZgeEzigdsdOO31Y-ADQ4a3Vec2aWg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rudi,

pdf version attached.
btw the text are really copy and paste from NCSG/NCUC/NPOC websites .
basically a strawman so we need to work and adapt it for NCSG context

Best,

Rafik

2015-01-26 17:10 GMT+09:00 Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> Can you provide de flyer in pdf format ? As I?m not using microsoft office
> the .docx looks a bit weird when viewed with libreoffice.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
> www.npoc.org
>
> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
>
>
>
> Op 26-jan.-2015, om 02:13 heeft Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> First let me welcome Tapani as the new NCUC representative to the NCSG
> replacing Milton. I want to thank Milton for his 4 years in the EC with us,
> you will be missed!
>
> Second, I am listing some actions items for the EC:
> - next EC call: as agreed we should have our EC call in the last friday of
> the month. However for this time we also have a 1 hour meeting in Singapore.
>
> Lori is not able to come to Singapore and I am not sure for Tapani. So can
> we use that session for applications review or shall we postpone the review
> to ad hoc call in 20th february, to give you more time to go through the
> applications. We can use the Singapore session for some strategic planning
> for this year.
>
> - Regarding the applications review please check the spreadsheets:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dENsT21PLTFmeW9qZ2pLLWowc3RTbmc#gid=6
>  &
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ane1uzL43HhedDFhOWZOTEVhMzZUYUszVFhpX1JEU1E#gid=0
>
>
>
> @Tapani if you agree we can have short call to explain how we proceed for
> the review so you can catch up.
>
> - We still have some material to review and need EC members input:
>
>    -  link to a mockup of membership application form:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1uPzS7nxQkGgndirN8JM_E067DXz42uXWKcBClxAd4KY/edit
> I shared it previously and resending it here. we discussed during the call
> about some info to ask to individuals e.g to highlight their
> "non-commercialness". also improving the form such as with mail
> notification when we receive new application .
> @Lori please check if you have the full access and see the whole form in a
> single page.
>
>
>    - process flowchart draft: I instructed Maryam to draft one so we can
>    post it in the application page to clarify to applicants about the process
>    and expectations in term of time response. we are trying to improve the
>    review period , by having our regular call by the last friday of each
>    month. I will send soon the new applications and also list of pending
>    applications to which we need to make final decision.
>
>
>    -  Maryam created a logo for NCSG and that can be good for NCSG
>    branding. she followed the ICANN graphic guidelines but we should make our
>    own changes.
>
>
>    - ICANN will support us to have flyers before ICANN meetings, we won't
>    make it for singapore but at least we got a draft  to start with. please
>    share your ideas and suggestions
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Rafik
>
> <NCSG Flyer.docx><NGSC_Logo.pdf><NCSG Membership Application and Approval
> Process v1.docx>_______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/3b37acfa/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSG Flyer.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 3186145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/3b37acfa/attachment-0001.pdf>


From robin  Mon Jan 26 22:03:20 2015
From: robin (Robin Gross)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:03:20 -0800
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Next EC meeting & action items
In-Reply-To: <CAH5sTh=M0hvs8jWX1Lm1CZgeEzigdsdOO31Y-ADQ4a3Vec2aWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6E07CF28-719D-4CFB-A4DE-95B089E94C5B@isoc.be>
	<CAH5sTh=M0hvs8jWX1Lm1CZgeEzigdsdOO31Y-ADQ4a3Vec2aWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54549BEA-1587-4E0D-B6A1-FE52FCE82DF9@ipjustice.org>

I think we should highlight NCSG groups and activities - for example the NCSG Policy Committee - that makes policy decisions.  

Thanks,
Robin

On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:

> <NCSG Flyer.pdf>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/7771d698/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/7771d698/attachment.sig>


From robin  Mon Jan 26 22:04:26 2015
From: robin (Robin Gross)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:26 -0800
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Next EC meeting & action items
In-Reply-To: <54549BEA-1587-4E0D-B6A1-FE52FCE82DF9@ipjustice.org>
References: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6E07CF28-719D-4CFB-A4DE-95B089E94C5B@isoc.be>
	<CAH5sTh=M0hvs8jWX1Lm1CZgeEzigdsdOO31Y-ADQ4a3Vec2aWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54549BEA-1587-4E0D-B6A1-FE52FCE82DF9@ipjustice.org>
Message-ID: <F30E16FF-54ED-432D-918D-2160C5AB793C@ipjustice.org>

And of course the NCSG EC also!  :-)

On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Robin Gross wrote:

> I think we should highlight NCSG groups and activities - for example the NCSG Policy Committee - that makes policy decisions.  
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> 
>> <NCSG Flyer.pdf>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/4fa11e15/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150126/4fa11e15/attachment.sig>


From rafik.dammak  Tue Jan 27 02:51:21 2015
From: rafik.dammak (Rafik Dammak)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:51:21 +0900
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Next EC meeting & action items
In-Reply-To: <F30E16FF-54ED-432D-918D-2160C5AB793C@ipjustice.org>
References: <CAH5sTh=UjN3XOXFoHrfECe62kPE6s+RGMJ4NoZwaBkz_G7sVmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6E07CF28-719D-4CFB-A4DE-95B089E94C5B@isoc.be>
	<CAH5sTh=M0hvs8jWX1Lm1CZgeEzigdsdOO31Y-ADQ4a3Vec2aWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54549BEA-1587-4E0D-B6A1-FE52FCE82DF9@ipjustice.org>
	<F30E16FF-54ED-432D-918D-2160C5AB793C@ipjustice.org>
Message-ID: <CAH5sThkCs_3bfuxRtLVNhfqkWjqxrGs0F-_ykszMm2P9YCXwUA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Robin,

thanks for this, can you please provide some texts as suggestion?
please check other items in particular the EC meeting

Rafik


2015-01-27 5:04 GMT+09:00 Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>:

> And of course the NCSG EC also!  :-)
>
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>
> I think we should highlight NCSG groups and activities - for example the
> NCSG Policy Committee - that makes policy decisions.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>
> <NCSG Flyer.pdf>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EC-NCSG mailing list
> EC-NCSG at ipjustice.org
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ec-ncsg
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150127/f3801a5b/attachment.html>


From rafik.dammak  Fri Jan 30 03:21:36 2015
From: rafik.dammak (Rafik Dammak)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:21:36 +0900
Subject: [EC-NCSG] Fwd: FW: Intersessional Question Regarding 3rd Party PIC
	Complaints
In-Reply-To: <D0EE7923.26A3E%robert.hoggarth@icann.org>
References: <D0EE7923.26A3E%robert.hoggarth@icann.org>
Message-ID: <CAH5sThk9f7BjGgJ8ixdu1MK20+eoQNFQV0mFkQj-B72S+7UOPA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi everyone,

I got this from Rob, as follow-up for NCPH meeting. I am not sure if it
answers Kathy question

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>
Date: 2015-01-29 5:39 GMT+09:00
Subject: FW: Intersessional Question Regarding 3rd Party PIC Complaints
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>


Dear Rafik,

Fadi asked that I communicate back the answer to an NCSG question he
promised to follow-up on during the recent NCPH Intersessional meeting in
Washington, D.C.

See below. I don't recall if you personally asked the question, but perhaps
you can pass the information back to your NCSG delegation.

I think if there is any follow-up about complaints regarding PIC
infringement, the best person to contact would likely be Allen Grogan at
allen.grogan at icann.org.

Best,

Rob

From: Allen Grogan
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 4:40 PM
To: Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: 3rd party

Yes, anyone can submit a complaint to ICANN contractual compliance about an
alleged failure to comply with a PIC, and ICANN contractual compliance will
investigate the complaint.

Complaints may be submitted to compliance at icann.org.


Regards,

Allen R. Grogan
Chief Contract Compliance Officer
direct:  + 1 310 578-8932
mobile: +1 310 795-8206
allen.grogan at icann.org

12025 Waterfront Drive
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
United States of America


From: Fadi Chehade
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:32 PM
To: Allen Grogan
Subject: 3rd party

Allen,
I need to get back to a community member with this question:

?can an NGO or a 3rd party file a complaint about a PIC infringement? If
yes, how?"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150130/ea077c98/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20150130/ea077c98/attachment.p7s>