[EC-NCSG] Membership form

[Milton L Mueller]

I agree strongly with Robin's suggestion. Let's standardize and simplify the application process as much as possible.

From: ec-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org [mailto:ec-ncsg-bounces at ipjustice.org] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:47 PM
To: Klaus Stoll; ec-ncsg at ipjustice.org
Cc: Eduardo Monge; David Cake
Subject: Re: [EC-NCSG] Membership form

Thanks, Klaus.

You aren't the only one who's been confounded by this process of dual membership evaluations (SG & C).  I think we all have been trying to figure a way to do this better and more efficiently.

There are a number of things we have to include in the NCSG application (like promising to follow ICANN rules) and a declaration of which criteria an applicant is applying, etc.

I think it would be easiest if we just create a single standard online form for the NCSG and then just boxes to check for which constituency(ies) to join also.  That could assure the applications come through NCSG first as they should under the charter.  And we could standardize our processes.

I've added the NCSG-EC on to the recipient list of this email since this is a suggestion for the NCSG-EC to consider as well.  And I've added David Cake as the NCUC Chair also since we'll need agreement amongst constituencies about how to do this in a uniform manner.

Thanks,
Robin


On May 14, 2012, at 8:39 AM, Klaus Stoll wrote:


Dear Robin

Greetings. Please give me some urgent guidance on the changes needed for the NPOC membership application forms. After reading the NCSG Bylaws and consulting with one lawyer, the only changes that need to be made is that the NPOC membership form needs to let any potential member join the NCSG and then in the same form they can opt to join up to three NCSG constituencies, (even if we only have two at the moment and even if that does not mean the constituency has to accept that member.

We need clear and quick guidance on this as the NPOC membership applications start stacking up and we need a solution urgent in order to process them.

Abrazos

Klaus

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/attachments/20120515/74e541ff/attachment.html>