[Ncsg-discuss] [Draft] Statement on the Suspension of Domain Services to Autistici/Inventati

[Christabel Mebaghandu]

A very happy new week to everyone. Reviewing the draft, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdeCneOyDTnwLEebU1wVhkBqSBz37REBFeh6FAEOVTI/edit?usp=sharing, I see that a lot of progress has been made with this statement. Do we have a timeline to conclude on this?

---

Christabel
________________________________
From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of Niels ten Oever <00001ded0bc22afd-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Sent: 09 September 2026 23:01
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Subject: [Draft] Statement on the Suspension of Domain Services to Autistici/Inventati

Hi all,

Based on the discussion we just had in the policy meeting, I share here
a draft statement:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdeCneOyDTnwLEebU1wVhkBqSBz37REBFeh6FAEOVTI/edit?usp=sharing

My drafting muscle is a bit rusty, but these two pages could perhaps be
a good skeleton.

The main tone and message is asking why ISOC, PIR, and Digital Identity
did what they did and what process they followed, especially taking into
account the public interest commitments they have made in the past.

I hope this helps.

Best,

Niels


--
Niels ten Oever, PhD
Co-Principal Investigator - critical infrastructure lab - University of
Amsterdam
Assistant Professor - Department of European Studies - University of
Amsterdam

W: https://criticalinfralab.net
W: https://nielstenoever.net
PGP: 4254 ECD5 D4CF F6AF 8B91 0D9F EFAD 2E49 CC90 C10C
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20260914/b9580d27/attachment.htm>