[Ncsg-discuss] Draft Statement posici=?utf-8?Q?=C3=B3n_?=NCSG HR and the Rules Of law

[Christabel Mebaghandu]

We resolved during the Policy Call that Niels would be the penholder for the draft statement. I'm reposting the document for everyone's convenience below:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdeCneOyDTnwLEebU1wVhkBqSBz37REBFeh6FAEOVTI/edit?usp=sharing

---

Christabel
________________________________
From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of Pedro de Perdigão Lana <00001ebb4caf3a2f-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Sent: 10 September 2026 12:15
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Subject: Re: Draft Statement posición NCSG HR and the Rules Of law

Hi all,

I was following this discussion and the meeting but got a bit confused with this last exchange - the idea of this last message was to propose an alternative statement, Carlos?

Cordially,

Em qua., 9 de set. de 2026, 19:41, Carlos Vera <000022318a8e4197-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu<mailto:000022318a8e4197-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> escreveu:
Please see this draft statement

Carlos Vera

<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BeDZCjzm9rRixp0hERisjOOuWlGUwxdZS7gQ8RBTADk/edit?usp=drivesdk>
[AHkbwyI3u5pwBcVYyXwlOdJ7mXGcm3NcNQL2NI4OkHbuXB_49881mRtUCknjaWC8a7TmXEJW0aij3TaVOKrXCeT6Gf2A6Hpl8T1vX2-P8I22ym2ZN6G2XYs=w1200-h630-p.png]
Draft statement<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BeDZCjzm9rRixp0hERisjOOuWlGUwxdZS7gQ8RBTADk/edit?usp=drivesdk>
docs.google.com<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BeDZCjzm9rRixp0hERisjOOuWlGUwxdZS7gQ8RBTADk/edit?usp=drivesdk>


El sept 9, 2026, a la(s) 17:03, Niels ten Oever <00001ded0bc22afd-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu<mailto:00001ded0bc22afd-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> escribió:

Hi all,

Based on the discussion we just had in the policy meeting, I share here a draft statement:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdeCneOyDTnwLEebU1wVhkBqSBz37REBFeh6FAEOVTI/edit?usp=sharing

My drafting muscle is a bit rusty, but these two pages could perhaps be a good skeleton.

The main tone and message is asking why ISOC, PIR, and Digital Identity did what they did and what process they followed, especially taking into account the public interest commitments they have made in the past.

I hope this helps.

Best,

Niels


--
Niels ten Oever, PhD
Co-Principal Investigator - critical infrastructure lab - University of Amsterdam
Assistant Professor - Department of European Studies - University of Amsterdam

W: https://criticalinfralab.net
W: https://nielstenoever.net
PGP: 4254 ECD5 D4CF F6AF 8B91 0D9F EFAD 2E49 CC90 C10C


Pedro de Perdigão Lana
Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600<https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR<https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
Doutor em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
Vice-presidente da ISOC Brasil<https://www.isoc.org.br/>. NCUC<https://www.ncuc.org> EC (ICANN). Secretário Executivo do IODA.
Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por engano, favor responder informando o erro.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20260910/8106335b/attachment-0001.htm>