[Ncsg-discuss] [Draft] Statement on the Suspension of Domain Services to Autistici/Inventati

[Raymond Mamattah]

Hello Niels,

I have gone through your draft proposal and I must say it is straight
forward to the point. Simple and no complicated grammar was also used.

>From the meeting, someone explained that PIR has its own board that
takes their own decisions. In this case, the person suggested we do not
lump up ISOC with PIR. I agree with the person,

My suggestion is we address the letter to PIR. If need be, we could write
another letter to ISOC separately.

Well done.

Raymond Mamattah
[image: linkedin]
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/raymond-selorm-mamattah/> [image:
facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/selorm.mamattah> [image: twitter]
<https://twitter.com/RMamattah>
Accra, Ghana


On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 10:03 PM Niels ten Oever <
00001ded0bc22afd-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Based on the discussion we just had in the policy meeting, I share here
> a draft statement:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdeCneOyDTnwLEebU1wVhkBqSBz37REBFeh6FAEOVTI/edit?usp=sharing
>
> My drafting muscle is a bit rusty, but these two pages could perhaps be
> a good skeleton.
>
> The main tone and message is asking why ISOC, PIR, and Digital Identity
> did what they did and what process they followed, especially taking into
> account the public interest commitments they have made in the past.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever, PhD
> Co-Principal Investigator - critical infrastructure lab - University of
> Amsterdam
> Assistant Professor - Department of European Studies - University of
> Amsterdam
>
> W: https://criticalinfralab.net
> W: https://nielstenoever.net
> PGP: 4254 ECD5 D4CF F6AF 8B91 0D9F EFAD 2E49 CC90 C10C
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20260909/51597658/attachment.htm>