[Ncsg-discuss] PIR and Autistici/Inventati

Kenechukwu Okekenta 00002122db04c5e1-dmarc-request at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Sun Aug 30 12:30:43 EEST 2026


Unless there's something missing, in my view and according to the piece, it
would seem it's unclear what basis the infrastructure manager should be
punished for the publications made on platforms running on its
infrastructure. This may not totally be supportive of free expression. :)

I do not think that publishing on a platform should make the management or
the owner of the underlying infrastructure liable for the content published
through the platform. Otherwise, it would simply be a case of, *"giving a
dog a bad name to hang it"*. I think it's important that no unfortunate
precedent is set in this case.

For example, there have been many confirmed cases of terrorist-linked user
accounts on then *Twitter*. Would it be best to say that *Jack Dorsey* (then),
is a terrorist sympathizer?

During the initial rampage of ISIS, when its then brutal leader - *Abu-Bakr
al-Baghdadi*  unfortunately beheaded *Peter Kassig *- an American aid
worker, in 2014, through the *British ISIS member,* the gory video was
shared via *YouTube*. Would it make a lot of sense to say that *YouTube* is
a terrorist sponsor or that *Google* is building infrastructure for
terrorists?

Well, I personally do not think so and hope the incident does not portray
"not walking the talk".

In any case, I hope we'll see more context as more information becomes
available.

Regards.

*Engr. Kenechukwu Okekenta fNSIG*
*IT **Project Coordinator, **Support Specialist, **Security Analyst,* *CDPO
and Educator*

*LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/kenechukwu-okekenta>*

On Sat, Aug 29, 2026, 22:08 farzaneh badii <
00001deb507b73c5-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:

> I shared for his technical reasoning. Which is one of the clearest one I
> have seen that provides evidence that PIR has taken action.
> The blog also mentions that this is not the first in this year that PIR is
> doing this.
> Also this is not the first time that the registry gets involved. And the
> EU and other places are not free from these kinds of actions either. We
> need to think about processes and transparency when such actions are taken.
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 9:37 PM Carlos Vera <cveraq at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bortzmeyer repeatedly calls what happened "censorship" and makes very
>> strong political statements against Trump and against the US prosecution.
>> Those are the author's opinions, not the results of his technical analysis.
>>
>> Carlos Vera
>>
>> El ago 29, 2026, a la(s) 14:16, farzaneh badii <
>> 00001deb507b73c5-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> escribió:
>>
>> 
>>
>> We need to demand more transparency in their processes and having to
>> follow “the applicable law” doesn’t mean that 1) they have to just follow
>> the order without consultation 2) provide no transparency whatsoever 3)
>> this was not a court order, they need to provide at least an explanation.
>>
>> Here is Stephane’s explanation of what happened
>> https://www.bortzmeyer.org/autistici.html
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 7:45 PM Kenechukwu Okekenta <
>> 00002122db04c5e1-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for sharing, Niels.
>>>
>>> It was quite informative and eye-opening.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> *Engr. Kenechukwu Okekenta fNSIG*
>>> *IT **Project Coordinator, **Support Specialist, **Security Analyst,* *Certified
>>> Data Privacy Expert and Educator*
>>>
>>> *LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/kenechukwu-okekenta>*
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026, 20:04 Kathy Kleiman <
>>> 00001e85639e37fc-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Niels,
>>>>
>>>> Good to see you back.  We don't have anyone on PIR's Advisory Board
>>>> right now, but I am on the PIR Board. That of course means I am not
>>>> involved with daily operations (although I was years ago). Let's
>>>> discuss
>>>> offline and get back to the group together.
>>>>
>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>>> On 8/28/2026 11:42 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Who is currently our representative on the PIR board? It is quite
>>>> > unsettling that PIR has taken away the .org registration from an
>>>> > Italian NGO following Trump government's executive order.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> https://sabotmedia.noblogs.org/the-server-called-paranoia-defend-autistici-inventati-before-september-25/
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Best,
>>>> >
>>>> > Niels
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> --
>>>> Kathy Kleiman
>>>> Past President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20260830/d7484c0f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list