[Ncsg-discuss] [Info] Review of Reviews l Refined outline

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Mohamed,

Thanks for the feedback.
I think that is good question to ask during the the webinar to the RoR team
how their proposal will ensure that.

Best,

Rafik

On Wed, Apr 22, 2026, 16:31 Mohammad Kawsar Uddin <kawsaruddin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you for sharing the refined outline and for the continued efforts in
> developing a refreshed reviews system. I appreciate the opportunity to
> provide input at this stage.
>
> I would like to raise a question for your consideration: How will the
> proposed three-pillar review system ensure meaningful participation from
> all stakeholders, particularly those from underrepresented or
> resource-constrained communities, during the scoping and review processes?
>
> I also look forward to further discussions during the upcoming webinars.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mohammad Kawsar Uddin
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 5:57 AM Rafik Dammak <
> 00001e06d4af460b-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the info shared from the review of reviews working
>> group about refined outline and their plan for the draft report prior to
>> ICANN86. It is an important topic for NCSG in terms of governance and
>> accountability in ICANN and we have to share our input as we don't have
>> formal representation in the working group.
>>
>> There will also be webinars planned and info to participate in shared
>> later.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> *Sent on behalf of the Review of Reviews Cross Community Group Co-Chairs*
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear SO/AC Leaders,
>>
>>
>>
>> On behalf of the Review of Reviews Cross-Community Working Group (CCWG),
>> we are pleased to share with you a refined outline that builds upon the
>> input received during ICANN85, as well as the continued collaborative
>> efforts to develop a refreshed reviews system.
>>
>>
>>
>> This outline is the result of active engagement with both members and
>> observers who have participated in the discussions. Their contributions
>> have been instrumental in shaping the current document.
>>
>>
>>
>> While we recognize that the outline lacks certain details, our intention
>> in sharing it at this stage is to present the foundational “backbone” of
>> the proposal and to seek your views on whether it provides a suitable basis
>> for the development of the forthcoming Draft Report.
>>
>>
>>
>> An announcement will be circulated shortly regarding two interactive
>> webinars that will take place on Tuesday, 5 May at 06:00 UTC and 18:00
>> UTC, each with a duration of 60 minutes and language services.  These
>> sessions will provide an opportunity for further clarification or
>> discussion but we welcome any questions you may have in the meantime.
>>
>>
>>
>> We kindly request that Nominating Groups share any considerations they
>> may have through the public, archived communication channel at *inputonreviews at icann.org
>> <inputonreviews at icann.org>*. We would greatly appreciate receiving your
>> feedback as soon as feasible to enable the CCG to reflect your
>> perspectives in a timely manner, as appropriate, as we elaborate our draft,
>> and no later than 12 May 2026. We aim to release our Draft Report prior
>> to Prep Week and will be hosting a dedicated session at ICANN86 to
>> gather further community input.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your engagement and continued support. We look
>> forward to your valuable input to ensure the proposed system is fit for
>> purpose, viable for all stakeholders, and addresses known challenges as
>> articulated in our charter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Review of Reviews Co-Chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> Avri Doria, Chris Disspain, Manal Ismail
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20260425/c989619a/attachment.htm>