IGP comment on WSIS+20

[Joly MacFie]

I would like to personally endorse all IGP's comments. although I reserve
judgement on the acronym switch (from NRI to NRIGF) until the wider
community has weighed in.

Joly

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:14 AM Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
wrote:

> Dear colleagues
>
> The Internet Governance Project has filed comments in the WSIS+20
> stakeholder consultations. Here is the position we took:
>
>
> https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/
>
>
> <https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/>
> WSIS+20 Stakeholder Consultations: IGP’s Input - Internet Governance
> Project
> <https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/>
> What should become of the World Summit on the Information Society? The
> WSIS+20 review process, culminating at the UN General Assembly in December
> 2025, will assess progress made since the original WSIS and chart a course
> for its future. The UN is preparing a “Zero draft” and asked for comments
> from the public. This is […]
> www.internetgovernance.org
>
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> School of Public Policy
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250715/14da9beb/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-iqc0zftx
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6749 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20250715/14da9beb/attachment.jpe>