[Ncsg-discuss] A few council issues for your consideration

[Manju]

On issue 2 re. DNS Abuse, sorry to add more work for our councilors, but
maybe we can consider a statement while voting yes?

I just browsed through the WG charter part of the Final Issue Report real
quick. Seems like there won't be a scoping team for this PDP since the
charter questions were already included (also you'll already be voting to
approve the Charter in the motion). It says the WG will be representation +
open model, but didn't specify the representation per SO/AC/SG/Cs. Maybe
ask staff to clarify that before voting.

Best,
Manju

On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 5:57 PM Johan Helsingius <
00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:

> On 02/12/2025 10:44 am, Bruna Martins dos Santos wrote:
>
> > Regarding point one, I also agree w/ the suggested approach.
>
> Likewise.
>
> > I'm fully aware that our priority was the API access, and that NCSGs
> > position was not necessarily "approach it at the appropriate time". I
> > was then wondering if we should oppose this motion - based on the lack
> > of proper council discussions directed towards prioritization and -
> > given the short timeline - suggest that we have an extraordinary council
> > meeting to address this issue ?
>
> I am sure I am not the only one taken aback by the speed at which they
> are pushing this through. This is where on-line meetings fail - it
> would be really useful to have some corridor discussions with the
> key people.
>
>         Julf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20251202/fa5b6f5b/attachment.htm>