[NCSG-EC] Fwd: ICANN81 Stakeholders/Board sessions

[Johan Helsingius]

Thanks! Added to the doc.

	Julf


On 27/10/2024 10:31, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Sure.
> 
> In response to this letter 
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/badii-et-al-to-sinha-24sep24-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/badii-et-al-to-sinha-24sep24-en.pdf> , ICANN Board mentioned that they will ensure that the ombuds office is going to be independent. What sort of new changes have been made to make sure that the ombuds office has the autonomy and independence needed to protect the community and staff and not just ICANN org's interest and reputation?
> Additionally, the letter requested that ICANN retract themessage posted 
> on August 15, 2024 
> <https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/message-to-the-icann-community-15-08-2024-en>. The Board's response did not address this request. Will ICANN review its processes on drafting community messages that communicate a willingness to change, rather than defensive and inadequate messages that sideline the victims? Will ICANN review its processes on drafting community messages that communicate willingness to change instead of defensive and inadequate messages that sideline the victims? Has the Board anti-harassment working group started discussing the best path forward with the community?
> 
> 
> Farzaneh
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 10:15 AM Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com 
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 27/10/2024 10:13, farzaneh badii wrote:
>      > We should talk about a harassment free ICANN environment.
> 
>     Absolutely. Would you be willing to formulate a suitable
>     question to the board (and perhaps even present it at the
>     session)?
> 
>              Julf
>