[council] Draft Letter to Tripti/ICANN Board
Yao Amevi A. Sossou
soyames at GMAIL.COM
Mon Oct 14 01:28:17 EEST 2024
Dear Tomslin,
I have no comment. The letter is clear for me. This is a critical
governance issue that needs to be addressed otherwise as it was mentioned
limiting the applicability of accountability mechanisms like the RFR, ICANN
may discourage community participation and weaken its foundational
commitment to transparency and accountability. I hope there will be room to
discuss thiss issue at ICANN 81 to understand the full spectrum and
implications.
Kind regards,
.............................................................
Yao Amevi A. Sossou
Researcher |IxD| IT Support | Project manager| Human centered
Entrepreneurship| SDG Advocate | Internet Governance | Youth IGF
Email: soyames at gmail.com
Twitter: *https://twitter.com/_amevY2 <https://twitter.com/_amevY2>*
LinkedIn: Yao Amevi A. sossou | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/ameviy/>
.............................................................
To promote respect for the environment, thank you to only print this email
only when necessary
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 9:55 PM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Let me know if you have any concerns with the attached letter.
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Ashcraft, Damon via council <council at icann.org>
> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 at 08:32
> Subject: [council] Draft Letter to Tripti/ICANN Board
> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
> All:
>
>
>
> Please see the draft letter that is proposed to be sent to Tripti
> regarding the IPC’ RFR dismissal. As discussed, the Council is not writing
> to specifically support the IPC—rather to point out concerns with the
> process concerning the auction proceeds and dismissal of the RFR in
> general. This draft was worked on in a small group with Greg, Nacho, Paul,
> and myself and we learned that the Registry Stakeholder Group had some
> concerns that Kurt conveyed to us. Kurt has been very helpful in conveying
> these concerns this version reflects edits based on those comments.
>
>
>
> Please review and provide any feedback you have.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Damon
>
>
>
> *J. Damon Ashcraft*
>
> *O: *
>
> 602.382.6389
>
> |
>
> *M: *
>
> 602.510.1640
>
> dashcraft at swlaw.com
>
> *SNELL*
>
> *& WILMER*
>
> swlaw.com <https://www.swlaw.com/> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/snell-&-wilmer>
>
> One East Washington Street | Suite 2700 | Phoenix, AZ 85004‑2556
>
> Albuquerque *|* Boise *|* Dallas *|* Denver *|* Las Vegas *|* Los Angeles
> *|* Los Cabos *|* Orange County *|* Phoenix *|* Portland *|* Reno *|* Salt
> Lake City *|* San Diego *|* Seattle *|* Tucson *|* Washington, D.C.
>
> This email and any attachments may be confidential and protected by legal
> privilege. If you have received this message in error, please do not
> disclose the contents to anyone. Please notify the sender by return email
> and delete this email as well as any attachments from your system.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list -- council at icann.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave at icann.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20241014/7f9cf9b5/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list