[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Consensus Call for EPDP-IDNs Phase 2 Final Outputs: 20-30 September 2024

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi Peter!

Was the Call for Consensus extended? We can still comment on it or ask for
clarifications?

There is an Implementation Guidance there that caught my attention:

*D7a Final Recommendations:*
*Implementation Guidance 12: *A Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS)
complainant is responsible for deciding whether to include allocated
variant domain names, if any, of a disputed domain name as part of their
URS complaint.

*Is there a reason why the excerpt "The exempted variant domain names
pursuant to Final Recommendation 3 are excluded from this requirement",
which appears in other similar recommendations, was not included, even if
adapted to the context, here?* I'm questioning because sometimes we see a
push (based on arguments such as the urgent rite of the procedure not
allowing for stronger safeguards) to make the URS "extra-protective"
towards IP rights holders, while also trying to go beyond the very strict
scope of this system.

I would like to understand better if this is one of those cases or if the
exception of the FC3-exempt-variant-domain-names is already implied.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>, IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and CC
Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em ter., 1 de out. de 2024 às 13:23, Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I am in agreement
>
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024, 4:09 pm Akinremi Peter Taiwo, <compsoftnet at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I am referring to the email below.
>>
>> As you know, Emmanuel and I have been the representatives on the IDN EPDP
>> and have kept members informed about the EPDP outcomes. Based on member
>> feedback from the mailing list and monthly policy calls, we would like to
>> provide our agreement to the EPDP Leadership regarding the EPDP-IDNs Phase
>> 2 Final Outputs.
>>
>> If there are any concerns, please let us know today so we can respond
>> with our agreement to the EPDP call for consensus.
>>
>> Apologies for the late notice.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear EPDP Team Members,
>>
>>
>>
>> On behalf of the leadership team, and as discussed during the Team
>> meeting #118
>> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=371327501> on
>> Thursday, 12 September 2024, this message is to notify you the opening of
>> the Consensus Call process on the EPDP-IDNs Phase 2 Final Outputs.
>>
>>
>>
>> The leadership team has proposed a consensus designation for every final
>> Output that the EPDP Team has finalized by 20 September 2024. These
>> consensus designations are contained in the attached pdf document titled, *“[P2
>> Final Report] Leadership Proposed Consensus Designation.”*
>>
>>
>>
>> This Consensus Call process opens today, Friday, 20 September, 2024 at
>> 22:30 UTC, for a 10-day period, closing on Monday, 30 September, 2024 at
>> 22:30 UTC. In accordance with the GNSO Working Group Guidelines
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-15mar23-en.pdf>,
>> *the EPDP Team Members are required to indicate via reply to this message
>> whether they accept, or do not accept, the leadership team’s proposed
>> consensus designations.* If no objection is raised by any Member, the
>> consensus designation is considered accepted by that EPDP Team Member. If
>> you do not respond before Monday, 30 September, 2024 at 22:30 UTC, the
>> leadership team will take this as acceptance of the consensus designations.
>> If any objection is raised for any specific final Output(s), the leadership
>> team is expected to reevaluate the consensus designation of such Output(s)
>> and publish an updated designation to be reviewed by the EPDP Team.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the event there is no disagreement by the EPDP Team with the proposed
>> consensus designations, your Support Staff will incorporate the Final
>> Outputs into the Phase 2 Final Report.
>>
>>
>>
>> As set out in the EPDP Team Charter
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/epdpidn/2.+Charter?preview=/166265992/167543874/CharterGNSOIDNsEPDPWorkingGroup20May21.pdf>,
>> *only Members appointed by their representative groups are expected to
>> participate in the Consensus Call process.* *Participants and observers
>> will not be able to participate. *
>>
>>
>>
>> For reference, please also see the attached document titled * “[P2
>> Final] FINAL OUTPUTS (ONLY)”* that contains the nineteen (19) Outputs to
>> be included in the Phase 2 Final Report.
>>
>>
>>
>> For more information about the Consensus Call, you may review the GNSO
>> Working Group Guidelines
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-15mar23-en.pdf>
>> or the EPDP Team Charter
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/idns-epdp-charter-10may21-en.pdf>
>> (Section VI: Decision Making Methodologies) *(both documents also linked
>> above)*.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> EPDP-IDNs Support Staff on behalf of the EPDP-IDNs Leadership Team
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list -- gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-epdp-idn-team-leave at icann.org
>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo/%(_internal_name)s
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards
>>
>> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
>> ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ ------- ------
>> ------ -------  ------ ------
>> *Policy Advisory | Data Governance and Privacy Consultant | Information
>> Security & Cybersecurity | Certified Salesforce Administrator*
>> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
>> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com
>> ___________________________________________
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20241001/b5deaaf3/attachment.htm>