[Call for Volunteers] Appointment of representative and alternate to the PPSAI IRT

Mon May 27 08:26:01 EEST 2024

Hi Tomslin,

This is a bit odd. Didn’t we discuss that most of those policy
recommendations were outdated and could not be implemented? Are they hoping
that by doing the IRT we can undertake feasibility for the recommendations?

This is why I did suggest considering time limits for implementing
policies. You can’t come up with a policy and then want to enforce it 8
years later! Especially in the technology space, that is not possible.

Best regards

Farzaneh

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 5:53 AM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear members,
>
> There is a request from Org for SG/Cs to appoint a representative and an
> alternate to the PPSAI IRT. We (NCSG) had concerns with the IRT going ahead
> but as you can see, Org is still going ahead with it.
>
> NCSG is seeking a representative and an alternate. Please read below for
> details of the role of the representative and on what the IRT will be doing.
>
> Send your EOI to me (mesumbeslin at gmail.com) copying Julf (julf at julf.com)
> and Andrea (andrea.glandon at icann.org) no later than Friday May 31st 2023
> for the policy committee's review.
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:        [GNSO-SG-C-Leadership] Appointment of representative and
> alternate to the PPSAI IRT
> Date:   Tue, 21 May 2024 19:59:02 +0000
> From:   Dennis Chang via GNSO-SG-C-Leadership
> <gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org>
> Reply-To:       Dennis Chang <dennis.chang at icann.org>
> To:     gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org <gnso-sg-c-leadership at icann.org>
> CC:     Leon Grundmann <leon.grundmann at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Following the publication of the Call for Volunteers
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-seeks-volunteers-for-the-ppsai-implementation-review-team-20-05-2024-en>,
>
> the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> organization (org) is pleased to invite you to nominate a representative
> and an alternate to the Proxy & Privacy Services (PPSAI) policy
> Implementation Review Team (IRT).
>
> The implementation process is an ICANN org-driven exercise.  ICANN org
> plans to employ the “Open + Representative Model” piloted on the
> Subsequent Procedures IRT and based on the GNSO’s PDP 3.0 model
> <
> https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/pdp-3-2-working-group-models-10feb20-en.pdf.pdf>.
>
> The goal is to provide a structure that allows for efficient resolution
> of issues that may occur.
>
> We kindly ask that your group nominate up to one representative and up
> to one alternate to participate in the IRT. Please note, we are asking
> each of ICANN’s supporting organizations, advisory committees,
> stakeholder groups and constituencies to nominate up to one
> representative and one alternate.
>
> Putting forward a representative and alternate is optional; all members
> of the GNSO Group are welcome to join the IRT as participants. In fact,
> we urge anyone who is interested in being selected as a representative
> to join the IRT as a participant first (call for volunteers
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-seeks-volunteers-for-the-ppsai-implementation-review-team-20-05-2024-en>).
>
> As you will see below, the roles of participants and representatives are
> nearly identical, with the representatives’ main function being that of
> an information-bridge to their community groups.
>
> ICANN org plans to host the first IRT call during the ICANN80 public
> meeting in June 2024. We do not require the nominees for the first
> meeting, but request that you conclude the nomination process and inform
> us of the nominees as soon as feasible.
>
> Why Have Representatives?
>
> While participants always speak in their own personal capacity,
> representatives are expected to speak on behalf of their constituency,
> stakeholder group, supporting organization, or advisory committee.
> Therefore, a key part of the representative’s role will be to engage
> actively and consistently with their colleagues to ensure they can
> convey their group’s viewpoints to the IRT. Please note, that this will
> require an efficient process for representatives to inform and receive
> input from their respective groups. To put this into place will be the
> responsibility of each representative.
>
> In addition, when determining the level of consensus in the circumstance
> described in Section V.E. of the IRT Principles & Guidelines
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irt-principles-guidelines-23aug16-en.pdf>,
>
> the GNSO Liaison, in the Open + Representative model, shall take into
> consideration that members who are representatives are expected to
> express the viewpoint of their respective community groups and
> participants to express their own views. This does not impact each
> member’s ability to raise any concern they may have, nor does it absolve
> ICANN org or the GNSO Council liaison from “exercis[ing] all reasonable
> efforts to resolve disagreements” within the IRT.
>
> More information can be found on this PPSAI IRT wiki page
> <https://community.icann.org/x/lQDSEw>.  We are looking forward to
> getting the IRT underway and, please, do not hesitate to reach out
> should you have any questions.
>
> --
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Dennis S. Chang
>
> GDD Programs Director
>
> Phone: +1 213 293 7889
>
> Sykpe: dennisSchang
>
> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>  One World – One Internet
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20240527/2cd4645d/attachment.htm>