Suggested amendments to ICANN's bylaws and NomCom

[Raoul Plommer]

Get the official numbers then.

On Mon, 29 May 2023, 09:29 Johan Helsingius, <julf at julf.com> wrote:

> Seems we missed more than one meeting. How many meetings were there in
> total, and how many did we miss?
>
>         Julf
>
> On 29/05/2023 16:17, Raoul Plommer wrote:
> > I did voice my concerns when the review team was asking for input on
> > recommendation 10, we submitted our reasoning for getting another seat
> > and yeah, might've missed that one crucial meeting with GNSO but I
> > certainly thought our councillors knew our stance too and I think it
> > would be quite weird if they didn't echo out concerns we've been very
> > vocal about for the last .. ten years?
> >
> > The biggest reason for recommendation 10 was the imbalance between NCSG
> > and CSG and everyone knows our stance very well. Using a pretext of not
> > being in one particular meeting over the course of five years of the
> > RIWG and thus ignoring our concerns over the last ten years is pathetic
> > in my opinion.
> >
> > -Raoul
> >
> > On Mon, 29 May 2023, 04:37 Johan Helsingius, <julf at julf.com
> > <mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Raoul,
> >
> >     One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the
> >     review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then."
> >
> >              Julf
> >
> >
> >     On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote:
> >      > Hi everyone,
> >      >
> >      > It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going
> >     to take
> >      > out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and
> >     shift the
> >      > decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.
> >      >
> >      >
> >
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf>
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf>>
> see pg. 4.
> >      >
> >      > The public comment is here:
> >      >
> >
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023>
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
> >>
> >      >
> >      > It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this
> >     and
> >      > agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)
> >      >
> >      > The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.
> >      >
> >      > -Raoul
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230529/ec73725a/attachment.htm>