[EPDP on IDN] Update

[Farell FOLLY]

Dear all,

Following our previous policy call and regarding the update I gave about IDN EPDP WG, I would like to share with you here the slide deck that would help to understand the progress of the team and especially the challenges mechanisms I was describing.

So far, the following question are open for discussions. Please feel free to weight in.

 
Question 1: [Assuming that the applied-for label has passed the mandatory string requirements and IDNA 2008 requirements] Should the applicant be allowed to submit an application for a gTLD label, knowing the label is invalid according to the RZ-LGR?
 
Question 2: Does the DNS Stability Panel have a role in assessing whether the RZ-LGR has been  applied correctly?
 
Question 3: Is a change request made to the Generation Panel to update the RZ-LGR outside the challenge process for the new gTLD program? Change request to update the RZ-LGR can be made at any time, not limited to the application period. 
 
Question 4: [Assuming that the application system has correctly incorporated the algorithmic check] Upon receiving rejection from the DNS Stability Panel, should the applicant be allowed to amend the applied-for label in order to conform with the application system? 



@__f_f__

Best regards
____________________________________

Lt-Colonel Farell FOLLY, Ir
GNSO Councillor
linkedin.com/in/farellf  






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20211109/199f540c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: EPDP Team Meeting #13 Slides.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1776663 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20211109/199f540c/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20211109/199f540c/attachment-0001.htm>