Registry Voluntary Commitments Plenary Session - Initial planning meeting and deadline to select panelist.

[Bruna Martins dos Santos]

Dear all,

Writing just to let you know that I have confirmed Kathy Kleiman as the
NCSG rep at the *Registry Voluntary Commitments *Session thats taking place
next week.

Best,
B

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:10 PM <kathy at dnrc.tech> wrote:

> Hi Bruna,
> I'm certainly available to participate in this important plenary
> sessions if NCSG would like me to.
>
> Best,
> Kathy
>
>
> Quoting Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:
>
> > And once we've got our volunteer for this session, we can work on
> > including your proposed question on the agenda.
> >
> > @Kathy or @David, would any of you like to volunteer for this
> > plenary session?
> >
> > best,
> > b
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:23 AM Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix <
> > rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Kathy, it's at 1530 UTC on March 25 :)
> >>
> >> Have a nice day,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:06 PM <kathy at dnrc.tech> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Bruna,
> >>> Tx for sharing this. I think we are missing a question:
> >>> ==> What should Registry private commitments never include?  [Answer:
> >>> issues that should be settled subject to the PDP process and consensus
> >>> policies]
> >>>
> >>> Do you know the date and time this session will take place?  That will
> >>> help in finding our NCSG representative!
> >>>
> >>> Best, Kathy
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> > Hey all,
> >>> >
> >>> > Hope this email finds you well!
> >>> >
> >>> > I am writing just to inform you that NCSG has joined the planning
> teams
> >>> of
> >>> > the two plenary sessions of ICANN70, and I highlight below important
> >>> points
> >>> > regarding the RVCs Plenary Session initial planning meeting:
> >>> >
> >>> > *1. Registry Voluntary Commitments *
> >>> > Main outcome would be to discuss enforceable mechanisms for
> contracted
> >>> > parties to make commitments to the community, enforced by ICANN
> contract
> >>> > compliance and so forth. Session will also present a short
> discussion on
> >>> > PICs after the 2012 round and the Subpro process that took us to
> today's
> >>> > moment of RVCs.
> >>> >
> >>> > *Introduction* - History of PICs and RVCs (Jeff Neuman)
> >>> >
> >>> > *Guiding questions*
> >>> >
> >>> >    1.
> >>> >
> >>> >    On the assumption that PICs/RVCs are the main mechanism for
> >>> Contracted
> >>> >    Parties to make enforceable commitments to the ICANN community
> >>> > (or public),
> >>> >    are there limits on their enforceability, e.g. under the ICANN
> >>> Bylaws?
> >>> >    2.
> >>> >
> >>> >    Are there specific challenges with enforcing PICs/RVCs as part of
> the
> >>> >    Registry Agreement (i.e. binding contract that all gTLD registry
> >>> operators
> >>> >    enter into with ICANN)?
> >>> >    1.
> >>> >
> >>> >       Panelists should give real-life examples if possible.
> >>> >       3.
> >>> >
> >>> >    What are the education gaps that ICANN org, Contracted Parties, or
> >>> other
> >>> >    parties (if any) should be addressing prior to further gTLD
> >>> expansion?
> >>> >    4.
> >>> >
> >>> >    How can enforcement of PICs/RVCs be framed to avoid the risk that
> >>> ICANN
> >>> >    org will need to make potential decisions on content?
> >>> >    1.
> >>> >
> >>> >       What registrant rights or interests need to be protected?
> >>> >       2.
> >>> >
> >>> >       What practical options can panelists suggest?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > This session shall have discussants, and I have secured a slot for
> NCSG,
> >>> > but I have the deadline until friday to inform staff about who our
> >>> > discussant will be.
> >>> >
> >>> > best,
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> >
> >>> > *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
> >>> >
> >>> > Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research
> >>> > <https://www.dataprivacybr.org/en/>
> >>> >
> >>> > Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> >>> > Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN
> >>> > <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/ncsg>
> >>> > Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  <https://igcaucus.org/>
> >>> >
> >>> > Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
> >>> > bruna.martinsantos
> >>> > bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
> >
> > Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research
> > <https://www.dataprivacybr.org/en/>
> >
> > Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> > Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN
> > <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/ncsg>
> > Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  <https://igcaucus.org/>
> >
> > Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
> > bruna.martinsantos
> > bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
>
>
>
>

-- 

*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research
<https://www.dataprivacybr.org/en/>

Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN
<https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/ncsg>
Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  <https://igcaucus.org/>

Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
bruna.martinsantos
bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20210317/e8efc5a4/attachment.htm>