[council] FW: UPDATED FOR YOUR REVIEW: Terms of Reference for Community Representatives Group to nominate the IRP Standing Panel
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
Wed Oct 21 03:09:20 EEST 2020
Hi all,
sharing this in order to put it under our radar and as something to
follow-up soon.
Best,
Rafik
---------- Forwarded message ---------
De : Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
Date: mar. 20 oct. 2020 à 20:43
Subject: [council] FW: UPDATED FOR YOUR REVIEW: Terms of Reference for
Community Representatives Group to nominate the IRP Standing Panel
To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>
Hi all,
As we have discussed previously, there is an ICANN bylaw requirement that
the community establish a nomination process for members of the IRP
Standing Panel. The GNSO needs to determine how we will contribute to this
effort. Our Standing Selection Committee (SSC) is one option that seems
purpose-built for such an appointment, and I believe there is some support
for that among our SG and Cs. I’m teeing this up for follow-on work after
ICANN 69 concludes, but also flagging it because it’s time-sensitive. Mary
will be available to answer any questions on next steps, and the Terms of
Reference are attached.
Thanks and regards,
Keith
*From: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
*Date: *Monday, October 12, 2020 at 4:48 PM
*To: *Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>, "Donna at registry.godaddy"
<Donna at registry.godaddy>
*Cc: *Susie Johnson <susie.johnson at icann.org>, KEITH DRAZEK <
kdrazek at verisign.com>, Fred Baker <fred at isc.org>, Rod Rasmussen <
rod at rodrasmussen.com>, "aheineman at godaddy.com" <aheineman at godaddy.com>,
Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Elizabeth Le <
elizabeth.le at icann.org>, Amy Stathos <amy.stathos at icann.org>, Olga Cavalli <
olgacavalli at gmail.com>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>,
David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <
Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>, "katrina at nic.lv" <katrina at nic.lv>, "
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com" <aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com>, "oscar at lacnic.net" <
oscar at lacnic.net>, "claudia.selli at intl.att.com" <claudia.selli at intl.att.com>,
"haforrestesq at gmail.com" <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, "wuknoben at gmail.com" <
wuknoben at gmail.com>, "pablo at nic.pr" <pablo at nic.pr>, "joankerr at fbsc.org" <
joankerr at fbsc.org>, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, "Julie Hammer
@Bigpond" <julie.hammer at bigpond.com>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes at icann.org>,
Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel at icann.org>, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>,
Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich at icann.org>, Robert Hoggarth <
robert.hoggarth at icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org>
*Subject: *UPDATED FOR YOUR REVIEW: Terms of Reference for Community
Representatives Group to nominate the IRP Standing Panel
Dear community leaders,
I apologize for adding to the number of emails you are no doubt receiving
as we move into the ICANN69 Community Week. However, we thought you would
prefer to receive this update sooner rather than later, so that you can
inform your respective groups and factor in the need to initiate your
internal processes to select members for the Community Representatives
Group into your overall planning and current activities.
Please therefore find attached the updated, proposed Terms of Reference
(ToR) that will guide the work of the Community Representatives Group to
select a slate of nominees for the Independent Review Process (IRP)
Standing Panel. We have included the additional criteria suggested by Donna
as well as cleaned up the document to reflect previous feedback from
various groups. As the first action will involve constituting the Community
Representatives Group, I will also highlight the fact that we have noted
your collective preference that the Group be kept small, comprise an odd
number (at least 7, but not more than 15, members), be as diverse as is
feasible, and possess certain skillsets in the aggregate. The updated ToR
also notes that the Group will seek to act by consensus, select its own
Chair, and maintain confidentiality of its deliberations while maintaining
as much transparency as is practicable (e.g. publication of the final ToR,
the Group members’ Statements of Interest and other relevant documents).
Assuming that the updated ToR reflects your understanding of the agreements
reached and general expectations of the role and tasks for the Group, we
suggest issuing a call for Expressions of Interest for potential Group
members soon. I will be happy to assist with drafting that call, and if
appropriate can send you a draft for your approval before ICANN69 concludes.
Thank you all again for your very helpful feedback and time.
Best regards,
Mary (on behalf of the ICANN org team assisting with this effort)
*From: *Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
*Date: *Monday, September 28, 2020 at 15:03
*To: *"Donna at registry.godaddy" <Donna at registry.godaddy>
*Cc: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Susie Johnson <
susie.johnson at icann.org>, KEITH DRAZEK <kdrazek at verisign.com>, Fred Baker <
fred at isc.org>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>, "aheineman at godaddy.com"
<aheineman at godaddy.com>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>,
Elizabeth Le <elizabeth.le at icann.org>, Amy Stathos <amy.stathos at icann.org>,
Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>, Samantha
Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>, "katrina at nic.lv" <katrina at nic.lv>, "
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com" <aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com>, "oscar at lacnic.net" <
oscar at lacnic.net>, "claudia.selli at intl.att.com" <claudia.selli at intl.att.com>,
"haforrestesq at gmail.com" <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, "wuknoben at gmail.com" <
wuknoben at gmail.com>, "pablo at nic.pr" <pablo at nic.pr>, "joankerr at fbsc.org" <
joankerr at fbsc.org>, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
*Subject: *[Ext] Re: Follow up: Community Representatives Group for
nominating IRP Standing Panel
I like Donna's additions.
Maureen
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 9:00 AM Donna at registry.godaddy <
Donna at registry.godaddy> wrote:
Hi Mary
Sorry for being late with my input. I support the proposal as captured as a
result of our last call and add a few criteria for consideration.
*Proposal for final community leaders’ discussion and decision: *
The Community Representatives Group should be a small, lightweight,
odd-numbered group of between 7-15 members, who [in the aggregate] have
[the following agreed] expertise and who, as far as possible, represents a
diversity of stakeholders and interests across the ICANN community. The
size of the group is less important than the skillsets/expertise of the
members on the group.
*Suggested non-exhaustive list of expertise which the Group should possess
in the aggregate: *
(1) experience in selecting Board members (or similar officers or
appointees with fiduciary duties) or service on a nominating committee for
such selections (note: does not have to be ICANN’s Nominating Committee;
experience in academic departments could meet this expertise);
(2) experience working with recruitment firms and managing vendors;
(3) relevant organizational and process experience (i.e. ability to
understand and evaluate the standing panelist criteria and responses, which
includes legal and arbitration experience) and
(4) understanding of the Independent Review Process and its role as an
ICANN accountability mechanism/relationship to ICANN bylaws (something like
that)
(5) ability to work in a small team across multiple timezones
(6) must be able to commit considerable time and effort to the selection
process over a short but concentrated time period
Thanks
Donna
*From:* Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong at icann.org]
*Sent:* Monday, September 14, 2020 4:44 PM
*To:* Donna Austin <Donna at registry.godaddy>; Susie Johnson <
susie.johnson at icann.org>; 'KEITH DRAZEK' <kdrazek at Verisign.com>; Maureen
Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>; Fred Baker <fred at isc.org>; Rod
Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>; Ashley Heineman <aheineman at godaddy.com>;
Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>; Elizabeth Le <
elizabeth.le at icann.org>; Amy Stathos <amy.stathos at icann.org>; Olga Cavalli <
olgacavalli at gmail.com>; Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>;
David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>; Samantha Eisner <
Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>; katrina at nic.lv; aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com;
oscar at lacnic.net; claudia.selli at intl.att.com; haforrestesq at gmail.com;
wuknoben at gmail.com; pablo at nic.pr; oscar at lacnic.net; joankerr at fbsc.org;
Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
*Subject:* Follow up: Community Representatives Group for nominating IRP
Standing Panel
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
Dear community leaders,
Thank you for your time and input during the calls and regarding the draft
Terms of Reference circulated previously, concerning the formation of a
Community Representatives Group to select a slate of nominees for the IRP
Standing Panel. Please find attached the following for your further
consideration:
1. *Updated draft Terms of Reference*, incorporating input received to
date (most recently from the GAC) as well as two comments from ICANN org on
the GAC’s questions about the role of the Empowered Community and document
disclosure – basically:
· while the EC may be a Claimant in an IRP, the formation and
selection of the Standing Panel is not an EC action; and
· requests for document disclosure will be handled in accordance
with ICANN org’s Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP).
1. *Notes from the 2 September call* where the composition and criteria
for appointment to the Community Representatives Group as well as a
possible timeline were discussed.
2. *The list of criteria and requirements for IRP panelists* that were
published along with the call for Expressions of Interest.
*Next steps as captured in the action items from 2 September*
For community leaders:
- Please review and provide comments on:
- The *proposal* that emerged on the call, as regards the Community
Representatives Group (viz. “The Community Representatives Group
should be
a small, lightweight, odd-numbered group of between 7-15 members, who [in
the aggregate] have [the following agreed] expertise and who, as far as
possible, represents a diversity of stakeholders and interests across the
ICANN community. The size of the group is less important than the
skillsets/expertise of the members on the group”; and
- The type of *expertise* which the Community Representatives Group
should possess in the aggregate (three of which, identified on the call,
have been captured in the notes).
- If your group wishes to provide input or additional comments on the
draft Terms of Reference, we will be grateful if you are able to do
so by *18
September* if at all possible.
For ICANN org:
- Following receipt of additional input on the updated Terms of
Reference (if any), we will prepare and circulate a consolidated and
updated document and timeline.
- Once a draft Statement of Work (SOW) is available as regards
appointment of the external expert, we will circulate the draft SOW to this
group as well.
Thank you. Please let me, Sam (Eisner) and Liz (Le) know if you have any
questions. We look forward to your continued discussions and will be happy
to assist in any way we can to facilitate your decisions.
Cheers
Mary
*From: *Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth at icann.org>
*Date: *Friday, September 11, 2020 at 20:26
*To: *"Donna at registry.godaddy" <Donna at registry.godaddy>, Mary Wong <
mary.wong at icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson at icann.org>, 'KEITH
DRAZEK' <kdrazek at Verisign.com>, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>,
Fred Baker <fred at isc.org>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>, "
aheineman at godaddy.com" <aheineman at godaddy.com>, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Elizabeth Le <elizabeth.le at icann.org>,
Amy Stathos <amy.stathos at icann.org>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli at gmail.com>,
Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, David Olive <
david.olive at icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>, "
katrina at nic.lv" <katrina at nic.lv>, "aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com" <
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com>, "oscar at lacnic.net" <oscar at lacnic.net>, "
claudia.selli at intl.att.com" <claudia.selli at intl.att.com>, "
haforrestesq at gmail.com" <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, "wuknoben at gmail.com" <
wuknoben at gmail.com>, "pablo at nic.pr" <pablo at nic.pr>, "oscar at lacnic.net" <
oscar at lacnic.net>, "joankerr at fbsc.org" <joankerr at fbsc.org>
*Cc: *Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, GACLEADERSHIP <
gac-leadership at icann.org>
*Subject: *GAC Comments Regarding Draft Terms of Reference for the
Community Representatives Group on the Establishment of the ICANN
Independent Review Process Standing Panel
Dear All,
On behalf of the GAC Chair, Manal Ismail, attached please find GAC comments
regarding the draft Terms of Reference for the Community Representatives
Group on the Establishment of the ICANN Independent Review Process Standing
Panel.
Best,
Rob
-----
Robert Hoggarth
Vice President, Policy Development and GAC Relations
Washington, D.C.
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council at gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20201021/5311dcaf/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Community-Representatives-Group-Terms-of-Reference - 12 October 2020.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 198238 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20201021/5311dcaf/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5901 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20201021/5311dcaf/attachment.bin>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list