Gentle reminders on Tomorrow's schedule

[Bruna Martins dos Santos]

Steph, thank you very much for sharing the discussion points again with the
list. Do you think it would be possible for us to invert the order of the
points ? -- I'm concerned with us not having time to discuss the new
Operational Design document, which is a new discussion but one that could
replace the google docs one ? (just a little prioritization exercise)

And apologies for such late response.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 7:58 PM Olivier Kouami <olivierkouami at gmail.com>
wrote:

> merci beaucoup Stephanie
>
> Le mer. 14 oct. 2020 à 20:34, Stephanie E Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :
>
>> Just a reminder folks, tomorow at 10;00 UTC we have the meeting between
>> the ICANN Board and the NCSG. They gave us this topic to focus on:
>>
>> Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and
>> opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to
>> consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that
>> has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM
>> (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting).
>>
>> We offered these topics for discussion:
>>
>>
>>    1. The NCSG would be interested to hear the Board’s views on the EPDP
>>    report, and the various letters that the CEO has been writing recently on
>>    that topic.
>>    2. ICANN has invested quite a lot of financial and personnel
>>    resources on the Internet and Jurisdiction project.  Since transborder data
>>    flow and jurisdiction remains an active issue both in our ongoing policy
>>    work (e.g. the EPDP) and in current data protection court cases
>>    (e.g.Schrems II and the US response to the removal of Privacy Shield as a
>>    preferred transborder dataflow option) we would be interested to hear about
>>    how the Board views the results and takeaways from this project.
>>    3. We are concerned about the growing use of google docs as a
>>    consultation mechanism. While it undoubtedly simplifies the work for staff,
>>    and possibly for some folks who are commenting, it does seem to us to steer
>>    comments in limited directions.  It is also awkward for those not used to
>>    the framework.  Could we have a discussion about possible options to
>>    mitigate what we see as risks with this mechanism?
>>
>> We followed up with two more, which were more or less amalgamated.  The
>> one on the EPDP  now reads
>>
>>
>>
>>    - The NCSG would be interested to hear the Board’s views on the EPDP
>>    report, and the various letters that the CEO has been writing to various
>>    parties on that topic, notably the GAC and DPAs
>>
>> And the final one is as follows:
>>
>> Thank you for briefing the GNSO Council on the new Operational Design
>> document which you recently circulated. We have a number of concerns which
>> we would like to discuss with the Board about this proposal.
>>
>>
>> Many thanks to Maryam, as always, for shepherding our last minute
>> revisions through the system.  Please tune in tomorrow to take part in this
>> discussion.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Stephanie Perrin
>>
>> Outgoing NCSG Chair
>>
>
>
> --
> *Olévié A. A. KOUAMI **Abd-El-Raouf *
> CTO de Ets "*Le FA de la Téranga*"
> CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut ds TIC pour le développement)
> Tél.: (+221) 77 422 16 47 (Orange) / (+221) 76 695  59 79 (Tigo)
> Tel.: (Togo) : +228 90 98 86 50
> *Skype : olevie1   FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.7 Twitter : #oleviek
> Popenguine, région de Thiès - SENEGAL-
>
>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20201014/fefc9eea/attachment.htm>