[Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan

[Mueller, Milton L]

Amr,
You actually hit the nail on the head here, so no disclaimers, please:

PTI’s own customers are themselves working towards variable degrees of changes to the way in which they operate to comply with these regulations, and there’s no reason why PTI should perceive this as a threat. The only threat in this context that I can see is for PTI’s customers to not comply with regulations, and cause damage both to themselves and the Registrants they serve. This should still have no impact on PTI’s role in carrying out the IANA functions, as far as I can tell. Unless there’s more to this potential “risk” that I don’t understand, it reads a little like hyperbole to me. PTI should probably just focus on continuing to serve its customers, and stay out of issues it is not mandated to deal with.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200524/34172a28/attachment.htm>