[Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Hi Tomslin,

Thanks for jumping in!

If I understand you correctly, your point is that the risk evoked here is
that of conflicting data protection rules? I agree that this is a risk
somewhere out there, but I don't quite make the link between a hypothetical
"hard" conflict of laws and the trust of the community in PTI; would you
have some language to suggest, either to add or modify what is in the
comment already?

Have a nice day,

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 7:52 PM Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the draft comment Raphael. Much appreciated!
>
> In the comment regarding "evolving  data  privacy  regulation  landscape
> may  have  impacts  on  the  level  of transparency  for  the  IANA
> registries,  which  may  erode  trust  and  accountability" being a risk
> to  *Maintain  stakeholders’  trust  that  IANA  is  the  proper  home
> for  enabling global  interoperability  through  unique  identifier
> coordination,*
> you wrote ".....to imply, for example, that data protection policies
> (including those seemingly developed by the community in the context of the
> Expedited Policy Development Process) may adversely affect “transparency,”
> “trust,” or “accountability,” represents a value judgement. This is
> problematic because PTI is not the final arbiter when it comes to the
> implementation of those values into the policies; the community is."
>
> In my opinion, I think it is fair for PTI to put that as risk,
> understanding that risk is a function of probability and impact. What they
> are saying there in my view is the fact that there is potential for
> different jurisdictional regulations to affect their ability to maintain
> stakeholders' trust.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomslin
>
>
> On Mon., 11 May 2020, 23:58 Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix, <
> rbeauregardlacroix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have drafted a comment. Comments, suggestions, edits are welcome. The
>> strategic plan itself is quite short so feel free to have a look too!
>>
>> Let's give it a week here so that the PC also have ample time for review.
>>
>> Have a nice day,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:34 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> PTI just published a public consultation on Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic
>>> Plan and asking for input. We commented previously on PTI budget and
>>> operating plan and so it is important for us to review this strategic plan.
>>> You can find here all the details here :
>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-pti-fy21-24-strategic-plan-2020-04-20-en
>>>
>>> I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and accessible
>>> to all in order to kick off the discussion and comments:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yjqC4fh-X9ISzJQWcxxwE75fHrNmnRuF93lCaweBjck/edit
>>>
>>>
>>> Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in
>>> drafting the NCSG comment, join the drafting team and collaborating with
>>> finance committee .
>>>
>>> You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this wiki
>>> page
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020 and
>>> listing those who drafted them or volunteered.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Rafik Dammak
>>>
>>> NCSG Policy Committee Chair
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200522/5f0fbeb9/attachment.htm>