Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms

[Remmy Nweke]

Hi
I think we can start with Mechanism A and review this after two/three years
and graduate to Mechanism C as the functions increase.
Regards
____
REMMY NWEKE, mNGE,
Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
DigitalSENSE Africa Media [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(DigitalSENSE Business News
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
<http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
<https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E>

*2020 Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D & Nigeria IPv6 Roundtable
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng>*
JOIN us!!

*Vice President, African Civil Society on the Information Society (ACSIS
<http://www.acsis-scasi.org/en/>)
_________________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.



On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 7:28 PM Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:

> I hope everybody is staying safe and healthy.
>
> The auction proceeds CCWG is asking for a response to this poll by
> Friday, April 24:
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SRHH2L5
>
> Do we, as NCSG, at this point, have a position on these questions:
>
> 4. Are you of the view that the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism
> for ICANN Board consideration, even if your preferred mechanism does not
> come out as the preferred mechanism of the CCWG overall?
>
> A) Yes, the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism to the ICANN Board.
>
> B) No, the CCWG should recommend the top two ranked mechanisms to the
> ICANN Board and have the ICANN Board make the final determination, as
> long as the other CCWG recommendations are followed.
>
> C) No, the CCWG should recommend all three remaining mechanisms and have
> the ICANN Board make the final determination, as long as the other CCWG
> recommendations are followed.
>
> 5. Please rank the three remaining mechanisms in your order of
> preference, with 1 being the preferred mechanism to recommend to the
> ICANN Board.
>
> A) Mechanism A: An internal department dedicated to the allocation of
> auction proceeds is created within the ICANN organization.
>
> B) Mechanism B: An internal department dedicated to the allocation of
> auction proceeds is created within the ICANN organization which
> collaborates with an existing non-profit.
>
> C) Mechanism C: A new charitable structure (ICANN Foundation) is created
> which is functionally separate from ICANN org, which would be
> responsible for the allocation of auction proceeds.
>
>         Julf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200508/496bd8bb/attachment.htm>