[Chapter-delegates] ICANN's Decision on Proposed PIR Transaction

Remmy Nweke remmyn at GMAIL.COM
Mon May 4 17:51:29 EEST 2020


Thanks Caleb for sharing
The waiting end has justified the means.
____
REMMY NWEKE, mNGE,
Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
DigitalSENSE Africa Media [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(DigitalSENSE Business News
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
<http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
<https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E>

*2020 Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D & Nigeria IPv6 Roundtable
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng>*
JOIN us!!

*Vice President, African Civil Society on the Information Society (ACSIS
<http://www.acsis-scasi.org/en/>)
_________________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.



On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:44 PM Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com> wrote:

> The feelings is good!!!!!!
>
> On Fri, 1 May 2020, 11:20 AM Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele, <
> muyiwacaleb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ISOC's response to ICANN.
>> As it look,  the matter is concluded and we should move forward hoping
>> that this will not happen again.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Andrew Sullivan via Chapter-delegates <
>> chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
>> Date: Fri, May 1, 2020, 12:09 PM
>> Subject: [Chapter-delegates] ICANN's Decision on Proposed PIR Transaction
>> To: chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear Chapter Delegates,
>>
>>
>>
>> Over the past several months there has been much discussion and interest
>> within our community regarding the Internet Society’s plan to sell Public
>> Interest Registry (PIR), operator of .ORG and other top-level domains, to
>> Ethos Capital. Under PIR’s registry operator agreements, the Internet
>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) must consent to this (or
>> any other) indirect change of control in order for the transaction to move
>> to the next phase of the approval process.
>>
>>
>>
>> ICANN has announced that it does not consent to the transaction. ICANN’s
>> decision effectively means that the transaction cannot, and will not,
>> proceed.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am, of course, disappointed by ICANN’s decision. ICANN took much longer
>> than it should have to render its decision, and in my view, stretched
>> beyond its own agreements and the remit in its bylaws. I am also concerned
>> that ICANN has shown itself to be much more susceptible to political
>> pressure than its mandate would recommend. Nevertheless, I am grateful that
>> ICANN has now rendered a clear decision. This decision means that the
>> period of uncertainty is over. In the future, we will continue to rely
>> on our colleagues at PIR to provide exemplary registries in rigorous
>> compliance with their ICANN agreements, and to continue to provide generous
>> funding to the Internet Society.
>>
>>
>>
>> When the Internet Society Trustees accepted the offer from Ethos in a
>> unanimous vote, they did so because they believed, and still do, that the
>> transaction would be good for the Internet Society, good for PIR, and good
>> for registrants in .ORG and all the registries PIR operates. It’s not very
>> often where an opportunity presents itself that has advantages for
>> everyone.
>>
>>
>>
>> When we announced the proposed transaction, several people, including
>> some in our own community, expressed unhappiness with it. I want to
>> acknowledge the criticism and emotions that greeted the transaction. I know
>> there are members of the Internet Society who were angry and hurt by this
>> proposal, and I am sorry about that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Several people also expressed disappointment about how the sale was
>> handled. If we could have better apprised you, our community, in advance of
>> this sale, we would have. Requests for large-scale consultation came
>> from across our community; this was not something we could possibly
>> undertake. The months since the proposal was announced have been hard on
>> PIR’s staff, and an extended consultation without any clear picture of what
>> the possible outcomes might be would have been worse for PIR and therefore
>> for .ORG. Neither the Trustees nor I believed we could undertake such a
>> consultation without damaging PIR, which would itself be harmful to the
>> community that relies on .ORG.
>>
>>
>>
>> Our community has been through a trial, and to address it, the Board of
>> Trustees has already embarked on efforts to repair our bonds. While there
>> were differing views about aspects of the proposed transfer, we have a
>> unity forged in our shared commitment to the Internet, and our collective
>> will to build a stronger and more accessible Internet is as assured as ever.
>>
>>
>>
>> The organization has continued to develop its staff function to better
>> respond to community needs, and to make sure that our work is both
>> demonstrably useful to the Internet and relevant to its needs. We have
>> received positive feedback about both the report of our 2019 activities and
>> the Action Plan for 2020. Our work on encryption, protocols, global
>> routing, time security, community networks, and other priorities are moving
>> with pace. Together we have work to do, especially at this time of global
>> crisis when reliance on communication – and especially the Internet - is
>> critical for society.
>>
>>
>>
>> We will continue to grow the operations of the Internet Society
>> Foundation, and we will keep working with our partners at PIR to ensure
>> that the Internet Society can continue to build, promote and defend the
>> Internet. In no way will this disrupt or slow the work of the Internet
>> Society, our chapters or members, to achieve our vision of an Internet for
>> everyone.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew Sullivan
>>
>> President & CEO, Internet Society
>>
>> sullivan at isoc.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS):
>> https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login
>> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct:
>> https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200504/03c08a73/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list