RPMs Comment

[Louise Marie Hurel]

A gentle reminder that the deadline for submitting the comment is *today*
<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rpm-initial-report-2020-03-18-en>.
It would be great if the team could have some input before submitting it.

Since it is a tricky format, it will take time to collate additional
suggestions into the google doc, so please kindly send comments as soon as
possible!

All the best,

*Louise Marie Hurel*

Research and Project Development Cybersecurity and Digital Liberties
Programme | Igarapé Institute

PhD Student Data, Networks, and Society | London School of Economics and
Political Science (LSE)

Publications
<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Louise_Marie_Hurel/publications>
Skype: louise.dias | Twitter: @LouMarieHSD <https://twitter.com/LouMarieHSD>
louise at igarape.org.br
louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com

*Recent publication*s:

Hinojosa, P; Aiken, K; & Hurel, LM (2020). “*Putting the technical
community back into cyber (policy)*”. In: Tikk and Kertunen. Routledge
Handbook of International Cybersecurity. London: Routledge.


Hurel, L. M. & Lobato, L. C. (forthcoming) “*Cyber-Norms Entrepreneurship?
Understanding Microsoft’s advocacy on cybersecurity*”. In D. Broeders & B.
Van Der Berg (Eds.), *Governing Cyberspace: Behaviour, Power and Diplomacy.*
Rowman and Littlefield.




On Fri, 1 May 2020 at 16:04, Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As some of you may know, the RPMs Working Group has a comment period
> which is currently open, and with a deadline of Monday noon for
> submissions. Unfortunately,
> the submission structure is not very user friendly - it's a long
> Google form, rather than an open end call for responses, which makes
> it tough to develop drafts.
>
> Nonetheless, a few NCSG participants in the working group were able to
> put together the attached as a proposed NCSG response. If you have
> feedback or comments, we'll ask that you provide it by Sunday at 1600
> UTC, so we can have 24 hours to incorporate them into the final draft.
>
> Again, apologies for the short timeframe - the comment period itself
> was relatively short, and the convoluted nature of the response
> process led to challenges in putting this together. Still, I think
> this is an important process for our constituency to engage with, and
> hope we can put something in.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200504/0bdc8ef8/attachment.htm>