NCSG Election Clarifications

[Aaron Meyer]

Having been a member for quite some time, largely quiet, I have to say I
don't understand how there is any issue regarding the charter. Section 3.1
is clear and unambiguous and must be strictly construed.

Aaron Eitan Meyer

Attorney at Law
Middle East Analyst, Consultant & Researcher
Cell. (845)729-6421
Twitter. aaronemeyer


On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:40 PM Vaibhav Aggarwal <va at bladebrains.com> wrote:

> I did not start this - My discourse was perfect. I showed dissent & that
> should be respected - How many people are active to the list 5-10 - what’s
> the membership - now shud v consider that either everyone else is in
> agreement of what is happening or are dissenting - by staying quite.
>
> My voice will not be muzzled Amr. I chose public policy intervention as
> one of my specialities, because I want to make a difference, & over the
> years, without having a personal objective & motive, I am able to show
> dissent. Not many do.
>
> I will take it to the helm if there is not public apology tendered. I have
> the right to self Righteousness. He was wrong - and it is the
> responsibility of the Chair too !! Or what’s the point ?
>
> My written discourse is absolutely well worded. But if anyone decides to
> get personal - why will I stop - I will put my foot down and warn.
>
> Disadvantages of being in public life Amr.
> We all have to watch our conduct, be mature about it & stick to the agenda
> - this ain’t the school for teaching or learning. Let’s just do policy,
> exchange views, grow & help grow & that’s it.
>
> There are ways to respond to someone’s comment - ways to tackle it - and
> the Muller threatens me for ejecting. How would I care - But he could
> mishandle - get personal - clearly disrespect - thinks he will get away -
> is it even sensible to say or think that ?
>
> Thanks Amr - but your would have noticed - I did point out that I am
> speaking - honestly because I believed that this group will respect ✊
> dissent.
>
> Let’s see !
>
> Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted.
>
> > On Jun 3, 2020, at 12:52 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at icannpolicy.ninja>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >> On Jun 2, 2020, at 5:49 PM, Vaibhav Aggarwal, Catalyst & Group CEO <
> va at BLADEBRAINS.COM> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> >> I will not just report you to the GIT in the USA but to ICANN also,
> >
> > Resolving disputes via creating problems in members’ place of employment
> seems to be a growing trend in the NCSG. This is disappointing, and not
> only of our members, but also of the NCSG’s leadership, which doesn’t do
> nearly enough to discourage this type of vindictive conduct.
> >
> > Vaibhav…, do you honestly believe that settling a dispute with a
> colleague in this space by threatening to make problems for him in his
> place of employment is fair or reasonable? Is this something you would
> encourage other members to do as well, whenever a dispute between any two
> of us may occur?
> >
> > I ask that you consider my question, Vaibhav, and think about the
> potential consequences of this becoming a common-place occurrence within
> the NCSG. I ask you this because, sadly, you are not the first one of our
> members to go down this path.
> >
> > Don’t you think that a dispute between you and another member may be
> resolved by other means, instead?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200602/21fe336d/attachment.htm>