NCSG Election Clarifications

[Vaibhav Aggarwal]

And Just for your knowldge - GIT is Georgia Institute of Tech - It’s in ur signatures ! 

Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted. 

> On Jun 3, 2020, at 12:23 AM, Vaibhav Aggarwal <va at bladebrains.com> wrote:
> 
> Don’t worry I will fend for my self - u be bothered about yourself. 
> 
> Sent from my mobile device. Typos regretted. 
> 
>>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 10:52 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> I have no idea what GIT is, but if you start reporting people to ICANN be assured that your message below is a clear violation of ICANN’s expected standards of behavior, so you may just end up ejecting yourself from our midst.  
>>  
>> Cheers,
>> --MM
>>  
>> From: Vaibhav Aggarwal, Catalyst & Group CEO <va at bladebrains.com> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:49 AM
>> To: Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
>> Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>> Subject: Re: NCSG Election Clarifications
>>  
>> Muller,
>>  
>> Watch it - Dont cross it - 
>>  
>> Responding to your Imbecile self is beneath me - for the sake for my respect for everyone on the list - Your talk is baseless, Senseless. And Before you open your heart to type Gibberish - here on the list - Disrespect everyone else, Look me up who I am - I will not just report you to the GIT in the USA but to ICANN also, 
>>  
>> You will have to tender an Apology in Public if I was to make it an issue. So stay the Hell in your LIMITS. 
>>  
>> You sound Racist and trust me - I have dealt with quite a few and fixed them too. 
>>  
>> -VA
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:51 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at GATECH.EDU> wrote:
>>  
>> Vaibhav,
>> Stop talking nonsense. Pay attention to the facts. The problem here is not that “veterans” are picking their successors, or we are being “undemocratic.” The problem is these two things:
>> 1)      There is a rule that requires that no less than 2 of the 6 councilors will be women,
>> 2)      Only one woman was running for the second position our rules require be occupied by a female.
>> Therefore, as a simple matter of logic, that one woman will be elected.
>>  
>> This has been explained several times. What do you not understand about this? The rule is clearly stated in the charter. Unless your goal is to needlessly divide people, please make sure that all your comments about the election reflect these facts.  IF you don’t like the rule (I think it is badly formulated) work to change it.
>>  
>> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>> Georgia Institute of Technology
>> School of Public Policy
>> Internet Governance Project
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> From: Vaibhav Aggarwal, Catalyst & Group CEO <va at bladebrains.com> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 10:45 AM
>> To: Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
>> Cc: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>> Subject: Re: NCSG Election Clarifications
>>  
>> Some what good but Muller - IF there are 100 people who vote - and 50 abstain - 30 Vote - Where are the ratios ? How can you call that an Election ? Where is the purpose of elections - Why to waste everybody’s time - Let Tapani or Robin and a Few Vetrans in the policy work choose who their successors will be - let it be nomination by wise people. 
>>  
>> -VA
>>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200602/5f87f0ce/attachment.htm>