A Proposal to Merge NCSG, NCUC and NPOC for More Efficiency in ICANN=?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=99s_?=DNS Work

[Johan Helsingius]

Full agreement with Sam, Milton and James.

	Julf

On 23-07-2020 17:39, james at icann.guru wrote:
> Full agreement with Milton here.
> 
> *---*
> *James Gannon*
>>
>> On 7/23/2020 4:27:05 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Jacky:
>>
>>  
>>
>> 1)    Current members low engagement in policy work 
>>
>>  
>>
>> This would not be helped by a merger, but it would not be harmed, either. It’s a different issue
>>
>>  
>>
>> 2)    Administrative overload for Maryam and the members of the various ECs
>>
>>  
>>
>> This most definitely WOULD be helped by a merger. One of the reasons there is too much administrative work is that we have duplicative, overlapping structures. And they confuse members or potential members constantly.
>>
>>  
>>
>> 3)    Need to grow the membership base (new members)
>>
>>  
>>
>> Have you every tried explaining to new members the difference between NPOC and NCUC and why it matters? I have been doing that for 10 years, and I can tell you it doesn’t help recruit new members. It is serious friction.
>>
>>  
>>
>> 4) To develop and maintain a strong voice in ICANN for our stakeholders
>>
>>  
>>
>> A more unified voice would be stronger.
>>
>>  
>>
>> It's far too early to determine that a merger is the solution,
>>
>>  
>>
>> Disagree, it has been obvious that a merger is the solution for about 5 years. It’s way late to come to this recognition, though I am delighted that Sam and other NPOC members have.
>>
>>  
>>