[Reminder] [Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG Comment on Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement

[Raoul Plommer]

I wouldn't want to lead it, but I'd like to contribute. The issue is
important.

It seems to me that ICANN shouldn't be receiving money for letting Verisign
dodge its pledge, of waiting another few years, before raising its prices.
It feels like a conflict of interests.

-Raoul

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 02:22, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
>
> I am sending this reminder if there is any volunteer to lead for drafting
> a NCSG comment regarding this public consultation on amendment on .com
> registry agreement.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> Le sam. 4 janv. 2020 à 09:54, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> ICANN just published another public comment and this time is about
>> Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement. I believe this
>> amendment will have impact on registrants and we should at least review it
>> in addition to the letter of intent. For more background and explanation
>> you can find more info here:
>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/com-amendment-3-2020-01-03-en and
>> here https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2020-01-03-en
>>
>> I created this google doc to be used during the drafting:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hiu2ak9SeZ5SC0dPSJOXiXGz2WHbPAz5RU9EwbogHWE/edit?folder=0AMJI0CB4QegiUk9PVA
>>
>> Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in drafting
>> the NCSG comment.  You can find the list of ongoing public comments in this
>> wiki page
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2020
>> .
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik Dammak
>>
>> NCSG Policy Committee Chair
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200114/b3937551/attachment.htm>