[SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Plenary Topic Proposals (3 submissions for review)

[Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix]

Either 1 or 2 on my side, theres been enough on MSHM improvements and as it
has been noted in our comment, its pretty much all on Board and Org to act,
now.



On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:26 PM James Gannon <lists at icann.guru> wrote:

> Our lack of understanding with NCSG of the realities of the marketplace
> has been a driver in failings before, we should embrace any opportunity to
> learn more about this from the CPH.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *James Gannon*
>
>
>
> *From: *Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele <muyiwacaleb at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 13 August 2020 at 18:28
> *To: *James Gannon <lists at icann.guru>
> *Cc: *"NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Plenary Topic
> Proposals (3 submissions for review)
>
>
>
> @James, I thought we are non commercial group. We should not be much
> interested in commercial drivers in option one. My argument could be flawed
> but I stand corrected that this should be the focus BC will be pushing for.
>
>
>
> I'd like to go with option 3. I feel multistakeholderism in options 2 has
> been overflogged as a thematic focus.
>
> Caleb Ogundele
>
> ________________
>
> Sent with thumbs from a small screen mobile device.
>
> Pelase exsuce typos adn errosr.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 8:06 AM James Gannon <lists at icann.guru> wrote:
>
> 1. The Domain Name Services Marketplace (Market dynamics, business models
> and commercial drivers)
>
> For me.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *James Gannon*
>
>
>
> *From: *NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of U Of T <
> stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA>
> *Reply to: *U Of T <stephanie.perrin at MAIL.UTORONTO.CA>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 12 August 2020 at 22:56
> *To: *"NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU" <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
> *Subject: *Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Plenary
> Topic Proposals (3 submissions for review)
>
>
>
>
> As you can see, there are three plenary sessions on the table for the next
> ICANN public meeting.  Your thoughts and proposals are welcome; preferably
> in the next 14 hours.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king at icann.org>
> *Date:* August 12, 2020 at 15:14:19 EDT
> *To:* SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning <
> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
> *Subject:* *[SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] ICANN69 Plenary Topic
> Proposals (3 submissions for review)*
>
> 
>
> Dear Community Leaders:
>
>
>
> We now have a total of three topic proposals for plenary sessions during
> ICANN69. The proposed topics are:
>
>
>
> 1. The Domain Name Services Marketplace (Market dynamics, business models
> and commercial drivers)
>
>
>
> 2. Enhancing the Effectiveness of ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model: A Way
> Forward
>
>
>
> 3. Domain Name System Abuse: Practical Solutions
>
>
>
>
>
> The detailed proposals are attached for your review before our upcoming
> call tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Tanzanica
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Tanzanica S. King
>
> Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
>
> ICANN
>
>
>
> Office   +1 310 301 5800
>
> Mobile  +1 310 995 3038
>
> www.icann.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200813/964be329/attachment.htm>