Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms

[Paul Rosenzweig]

Well, that's true if we put all 3 forward as well, isn't it?  At the Board level, C is not gonna happen either -- or am I mistaken.

But if C is what we want; and C isn't going to happen then either we are "purists" and say what we want or we are strategic and go for "one only and it is A" as our second choice.

Offering 3 to the Board that includes B is just a formula for the Board to take that sort of compromise model.

This is really a fun game theory question ...

P

Paul Rosenzweig
Paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

-----Original Message-----
From: Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> 
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 12:22 PM
To: paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com; NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms

Thanks, Paul!

> Why don't we just say what we really feel -- that there should be only 1 option on offer and it should be C?
Because C is unlikely to prevail if only one is picked.

	Julf