Zoom is compromised

Sat Apr 18 12:59:31 EEST 2020

Thank you @Michael for the sharing

Le sam. 18 avr. 2020 à 14:55, Joan katambi <joanhopek at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Thanks for the guide @Michael though i think this gives us lessons to
> better check our options for which online tool/app to work with for our
> meetings.
>
> Joan
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 4:43 PM Oreoluwa Somolu Lesi <oreoluwa at wtec.org.ng>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for sharing this great resource, Micheal.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Ore
>> --
>> Oreoluwa Lesi
>> Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC)
>> +234.803.621.1307, +234.813.339.9999 | www.wtec.org.ng
>> <https://wtec.org.ng/> | @wteconline
>> <https://www.instagram.com/wteconline/>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17/04/2020 8:13 pm, Michael J. Oghia wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Yesterday, while I was participating in a Zoom session hosted by an
>> activists' group I'm part of, our meeting was "bombed" (hijacked) by highly
>> disturbing and traumatising imagery. This experience left all of us on the
>> call quite shaken, but I told myself that it can be the catalyst for action
>> so that we can protect ourselves going forward. As such, I compiled a short
>> guide
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUV_z0XkuN2rQ5bDYFx9BBWM4rpYpO5Ker5ZWDnPr9M/edit?usp=sharing>
>> on how to protect ourselves from Zoom-bombing that I want to share.
>>
>> Stay safe and well,
>> -Michael
>> __________________
>>
>> Michael J. Oghia | Advocacy & Engagement Manager
>> Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD <https://gfmd.info>)
>> Belgrade, Serbia | Twitter <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:48 AM Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> See this FAQ from Citizen Lab about Zoom:
>>> https://citizenlab.ca/2020/04/faq-on-zoom-security-issues/
>>>
>>> Stay safe and well,
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:02 PM dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Joly,  we need a few extra rows to address security concerns
>>>> including secret backend permissions and access given to national security.
>>>> Great matrix. I will circulate.
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:49 AM Joly MacFie <jolynyc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Diplo have put together such a matrix. I am sure they will appreciate
>>>>> any further input.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.diplomacy.edu/conference-tech-lab
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 7:43 AM dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Raoul,  All of the major meeting platforms have serious issues.
>>>>>> I do not believe zoom is more disastrous than the others. It was not
>>>>>> obscure, tens of millions of people all over the world have been using it
>>>>>> for years and this is not the first time issues have come up.  I agree that
>>>>>> we should watch carefully to see if they improve on the existing situation.
>>>>>> Please point me to independent reviews of Jitsi before I even think
>>>>>> about it.  I hope security researchers have also looked into it.  Perhaps
>>>>>> we should look at Houseparty?(Joke)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact is that capitalist competition is driving some of the public
>>>>>> discussion (e.g.competition for software used in schools - general approach
>>>>>> get them to use it in school and they will never leave) so it is good if we
>>>>>> stick to objective facts.  Perhaps someone could create a matrix so we
>>>>>> compare the issues for the various platforms : IBM, Google Open
>>>>>> Meetings, ClickMeeting, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation, Citrix
>>>>>> Systems, Inc. and Cisco Systems.  Kindly note that when I started
>>>>>> using it zoom was distributed and free (I have never paid for zoom) and
>>>>>> even touted as open source even though most people would not agree with
>>>>>> that claim.   All the best and thanks in advance to the brilliant person
>>>>>> who will create the matrix.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:36 AM Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bruce Schneier isn't exactly flattering them either:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2020/04/security_and_pr_1.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "That's what we know about Zoom's privacy and security so far.
>>>>>>> Expect more revelations in the weeks and months to come. The New York
>>>>>>> Attorney General is investigating
>>>>>>> <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/30/technology/new-york-attorney-general-zoom-privacy.html>
>>>>>>>  the company. Security researchers are combing through the
>>>>>>> software, looking for other things Zoom is doing and not telling anyone
>>>>>>> about. There are more stories waiting to be discovered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Zoom is a security and privacy disaster
>>>>>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/apr/02/zoom-technology-security-coronavirus-video-conferencing>,
>>>>>>> but until now had managed to avoid public accountability because it was
>>>>>>> relatively obscure. Now that it's in the spotlight, it's all coming out.
>>>>>>> (Their 4/1 response to all of this is here
>>>>>>> <https://blog.zoom.us/wordpress/2020/04/01/a-message-to-our-users/>.)
>>>>>>> On 4/2, the company said
>>>>>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/apr/02/zoom-says-engineers-will-focus-on-security-and-safety-issues>
>>>>>>>  it would freeze all feature development and focus on security and
>>>>>>> privacy. Let's see if that's anything more than a PR move.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the meantime, you should either lock Zoom down as best you can,
>>>>>>> or -- better yet -- abandon the platform altogether. Jitsi
>>>>>>> <https://jitsi.org/> is a distributed, free, and open-source
>>>>>>> alternative. Start your meeting here <https://meet.jit.si/>."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Raoul
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 21:07, Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://theintercept.com/2020/04/03/zooms-encryption-is-not-suited-for-secrets-and-has-surprising-links-to-china-researchers-discover/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> " In addition to promptly fixing several security issues that were
>>>>>>>> reported, the company removed an “attendee attention tracker” feature, a
>>>>>>>> privacy nightmare which let meeting hosts track whether participants had
>>>>>>>> the Zoom window — or some other app’s window — in focus during a meeting.
>>>>>>>> It has also invested in new training materials to teach users about the
>>>>>>>> security features like setting passwords on meetings to avoid
>>>>>>>> Zoom-bombing
>>>>>>>> <https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/boston/news/press-releases/fbi-warns-of-teleconferencing-and-online-classroom-hijacking-during-covid-19-pandemic>,
>>>>>>>> the phenomenon where people disrupt unprotected Zoom meetings."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm glad they're fixing the faults but some of these seem like it's
>>>>>>>> going to take quite a while. I'm no security expert, but some people that I
>>>>>>>> know have been very concerned over these revelations during the past week.
>>>>>>>> If there was no "bashing", they probably wouldn't have treated these issues
>>>>>>>> as priority.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Raoul
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Carlos Afonso <
>>>>>>>> 0000103799ed46a9-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/apr/02/zoom-technology-security-coronavirus-video-conferencing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> frt rgds
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --c.a.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =====================
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 27/03/2020 18:53, Raoul Plommer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > FYI:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/mar/27/trolls-zoom-privacy-settings-covid-19-lockdown
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carlos A. Afonso
>>>>>>>>> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em
>>>>>>>>> contrário]
>>>>>>>>> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br
>>>>>>>>> ISOC-BR - https://isoc.org.br
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dorothy Gordon
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dorothy Gordon
>>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200418/345c4bfe/attachment.htm>