Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms

[lists@icann.guru]

My personal opinion is A: One Mechanism and C: A new foundation structure.


---
James Gannon
On 13/04/2020 19:27:33, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
I hope everybody is staying safe and healthy.

The auction proceeds CCWG is asking for a response to this poll by
Friday, April 24:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SRHH2L5

Do we, as NCSG, at this point, have a position on these questions:

4. Are you of the view that the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism
for ICANN Board consideration, even if your preferred mechanism does not
come out as the preferred mechanism of the CCWG overall?

A) Yes, the CCWG should only recommend one mechanism to the ICANN Board.

B) No, the CCWG should recommend the top two ranked mechanisms to the
ICANN Board and have the ICANN Board make the final determination, as
long as the other CCWG recommendations are followed.

C) No, the CCWG should recommend all three remaining mechanisms and have
the ICANN Board make the final determination, as long as the other CCWG
recommendations are followed.

5. Please rank the three remaining mechanisms in your order of
preference, with 1 being the preferred mechanism to recommend to the
ICANN Board.

A) Mechanism A: An internal department dedicated to the allocation of
auction proceeds is created within the ICANN organization.

B) Mechanism B: An internal department dedicated to the allocation of
auction proceeds is created within the ICANN organization which
collaborates with an existing non-profit.

C) Mechanism C: A new charitable structure (ICANN Foundation) is created
which is functionally separate from ICANN org, which would be
responsible for the allocation of auction proceeds.

Julf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20200413/1145e1b9/attachment.htm>