Relevant to the cause?

[dorothy g]

This is beyond privacy, it is to do with hegemony and control without
accountability. It is to do with how we should organise our digital future.
As to influence, the future will reveal all.

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sent from my mobile
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2019, 22:32 dorothy g, <dgdorothydg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Farell,  There are many excellent articles on this topic but from
>> a co-founder this will have a lot of influence.
>>
>
> SO: While I do not downplay the privacy issues, I don't think the article
> of a co-founder who already cashed out of FB would add the much significant
> influence expected.
>
> Regards
>
>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:03 PM Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I found this article about facebook and privacy particularly
>>> interesting. It has nothing to do directly with domain names but It can
>>> educate more on how and why users should take more care about their data
>>> and how it is processed.` Also, it pointes out the danger of monopoly
>>> versus a multi stakeholder approach.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/opinion/sunday/chris-hughes-facebook-zuckerberg.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> @__f_f__
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> ____________________________________
>>>
>>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>>> NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
>>> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dorothy Gordon
>>
>

-- 
Dorothy Gordon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20190513/a9243f5e/attachment.htm>