Auction proceeds - second public comment period needed?
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie at DIGITALDISCRETION.CA
Fri May 10 09:48:28 EEST 2019
In my view, a second public comment period is always a good idea, but
particularly when something is moving as slowly as this one. Time
passes, issues change.
Stephanie Perrin
On 2019-05-09 10:04, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> One of the questions coming out of the CCWG Auction Proceeds
> call this week is whether a second public comment period is
> desirable, and if so, what the minimum duration for the comment
> period should be. This is in light of the actions being taken
> in response to the first comment period:
>
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138829/new%20gTLD%20AP%20CCWG%20Agreements%20-%20updated%2022%20April%202019.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1555965919000&api=v2
>
> Julf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20190510/e49a2220/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list