Procedures/Individual/organizations membership at NCSG

Raoul Plommer plommer at GMAIL.COM
Sun Sep 9 05:09:09 EEST 2018


The number of employees is a very different indicator to the amount of
members of an organisation. We shouldn't treat them the same.

If I understood correctly, you'd want to divide the small organisations
into tiny and small. Since only four people can represent an organisation
at NCSG (two reps for each constituency), I feel it's unnecessary to create
additional restrictions on participation.

-Raoul

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 01:21, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Thanks a lot for commenting. I have now incorporated your comments
> improved the document and sent to NCSG EC for review and approval. They
> have until 21st September to review, make changes if needed and approve. If
> they don't make major substantive changes, we won't do a second reading.
>
> Best
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:49 AM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> We had a discussion a couple of weeks ago about organizational members
>> and individual members of NCSG and what to do in case of dual membership at
>> NCSG.
>>
>> I drafted this preliminary document for your review (preferably to be
>> reviewed by 21st Aug).
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gt7vfXOl1RjTdh_iQd7E4yUjEiGez24jexNodQopgks/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Look forward to your suggestion for changes, additions, and especially
>> weighing in on limitation on the number of representatives and
>> additional membership.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180909/ee37126f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list