SSAC Update

[Farell FOLLY]

Yeah indeed. I did draw our attention on it, on purpose. ;)

@__f_f__

Best Regards
____________________________________

(Ekue) Farell FOLLY
NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
linkedin.com/in/farellf 






> On 4 Nov 2018, at 21:19, Johan Helsingius <julf at JULF.COM> wrote:
> 
> Especially interesting is that SSAC thinks the subsequent procedures
> PDP WG is proceeding too quickly.
> 
> 	Julf
> 
> On 04/11/18 17:22, Farell FOLLY wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> During my participation at the ICANN63 as an alternate GNSO councillor,
>> I have got the opportunity to attend an SSAC informational session that,
>> I think, could be of interest. Please check the document in attach.
>> Within, you will find interesting stuff about the SSAC impression on the
>> new gTLDs subsequent procedures Working Group, its current work, and
>> topics of Interest.
>> 
>> As a security expert, I am interested in what the SSAC does especially
>> when it comes DNS security protocol and the security Internet of Things
>> (planned and yet to come). As such, it would be a pleasure for me tos p
>> share news about this AC, coach people who would like to know more and
>> lead drafting teams during ssac-related public comments.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> @__f_f__
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> ____________________________________
>> 
>> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>> NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
>> linkedin.com/in/farellf <http://linkedin.com/in/farellf> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20181105/f6097615/attachment.htm>