[Info] German Court Rules on ICANN Request to Preserve WHOIS Data

[valentina hvale pellizzer]

Well

I know will sound foolish but why would be staff accountability off the
table? than what is the sense of all these committee, consultations,
working groups, big transitions, big policies.

Find it very depressing and exploitive

hvale


On 05/31/2018 09:13 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> It was a very strange legal strategy that ICANN employed. Now that it
> has failed, I wonder what action ICANN org will take next -- I presume
> staff accountability for mishandling the issue, and putting forward
> such questionable advice, is off the table, but what's plan D? What
> will finally give ICANN org the "clarity" it so desperately craves?
>
> "While ICANN appreciates the prompt attention the Court paid to this
> matter, the Court's ruling today did not provide the clarity
> that ICANN was seeking when it initiated the injunction proceedings,"
> said John Jeffrey, ICANN's General Counsel and Secretary.
>
> —Ayden 
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 31 May 2018 6:14 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> you can find here the update on litigation initiated by
>> ICANN https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en. the
>> court rejected injunction requested by ICANN.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>

-- 
valentina pellizzer
President
One World Platform 

https://oneworldplatform.net/

mobile: +387 (0)61 484 038
twitter: @froatosebe

Fingerprint 30AA 9445 D878 A6C9 FE41 E90D 52A5 36A6 B249 EDA9


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180531/7bd40669/attachment.htm>