Comments on the draft EPDP Charter

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

that seems a latest amendment proposed by an unknown person. However, to be
clear, there was no agreement yet on that.
I understand one idea from our side to push for equality is to reflect the
council distribution for the case of GNSO SG: 3 for registrars, 3 for
registries, 6 for NCSG and 6 for CSG. we should propose that in drafting
team

Best,

Rafik

Le ven. 29 juin 2018 à 06:09, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi
>
> I am astonished by the division of EPDP team. from what I see now, CSG
> altogether gets 9 members while we only get 3 members to appoint. CPH gets
> 6 in total, and NCPH gets 12, 9 members of which belong to CSG!!!!
>
> So, this is fundamentally unfair.
>
> We need to change this now.  Each stakeholder group can appoint 3 members.
> so CSG appoints 3 we (NCSG) appoints 3.  on equal footing with CPH and our
> own house!
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The changes provide both fairness and balance. Tx you, Stephanie, for
>> this work -- and all of our NCSG Council members for an incredible week of
>> endless work, complete attention and active advocacy. It's how the
>> Multistakeholder Model works!
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>>
>> On 6/28/2018 12:11 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>
>> I have made extensive comments to the document.
>>
>> Stephanie Perrin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.
>> www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>> <#m_-3493850087038799187_m_-435425529431890524_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180628/3fde403e/attachment.htm>