[article] Is the new Whois policy group already doomed to fail?

[Tatiana Tropina]

Hi Michael,
the problem of these "early disagreements" is that the EPDP charter has a
fundamental flow - section J (as Ayden and I stated) so it's not just
disagreements, the section J is a serious problem that indeed might just by
a sheer presence in the scope of the EPDP set it for failure. I say "might"
as I do hope it won't.
I also found the "IP-Friendly NPOC" line rather amusing :-) even with
Ayden's explanation, it's still amusing a bit, taking into account the
Pirate Party vice chair :-)
Cheers,
Tanya

On 24 July 2018 at 19:26, Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Bit of a click-baity headline. Obviously the EPDP is facing a
> challenging task, but it seems to be a bit of an overstatement to say
> it's doomed to fail just because of these early disagreements.
>
> I was also struck by the line that NPOC is "IP-friendly". Presumably
> that will come as a surprise to their Vice Chair, who was (I believe?)
> a founder of the Pirate Party of Finland...
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am sharing this article for information purposes, as three of your
> > Councillors on the GNSO Council have been mentioned by name within it:
> >
> > Is the new Whois policy group already doomed to fail?
> > DomainIncite (24 July 2018)
> > http://domainincite.com/23201-is-the-new-whois-policy-group-
> already-doomed-to-fail
> >
> > I would encourage you to read this article.
> >
> > If you have any questions regarding how we voted on July 19, please let
> us
> > know, either on-list or off-list, as you prefer. We are accountable,
> after
> > all, to you.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Ayden Férdeline
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180724/1d6f9b54/attachment.htm>