INTA Conference - REPORT

Collin Kurre collin at ARTICLE19.ORG
Tue Jul 3 06:42:27 EEST 2018


Dear colleagues, 

Many thanks to Michael and Kathy for this insightful post. I particularly appreciate the efforts to reach across the aisle and find common ground with other constituencies. As the report highlights, uncompromising behavior based on dichotomous posturing (real or perceived) is ultimately harmful to consensus-based multistakeholder decision-making processes.

A couple substantive follow-up questions:
Would either of you care to share more information about how the IPC approach and prioritize issues? (mentioned in the final paragraph)
Did you hear any discussions about ongoing fast-track content removal processes, such as trusted notifier programs?
Kind regards,
Collin

--
Collin Kurre
ARTICLE 19


> On Jul 2, 2018, at 8:57 PM, Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached a report by Michael Karanicolas and Kathy Kleiman, based on attending the INTA conference approved as an Additional Budget Request (ABR) to pilot engagement and outreach to the community of INTA attendees.
> 
> --
> Many thanks,
> 
> Maryam Bakoshi | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator 
> ICANN | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers 
> S: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | T: +44 7846 471777
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <INTA Blog.MK.KK.docx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180703/159cc2ad/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ncsg-discuss mailing list