Data Protection and Privacy Update: Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Compliance Models

[Ayden Férdeline]

I could live with the second model.

The key differentiation between Model 2A and 2B is its applicability: 2A applies only "where the registrant, registry, registrar or a processor are located in the European Economic Area"; 2B "applies to all registrations on a global basis without regard to location of registry, registrar registrant, and processing activities"

On this basis I think Model 2B is the best path forward. To have fragmented approaches for different regions would be a mistake, in my opinion.

Given the short turnaround time here (we need to agree on a position and submit a comment by 29 January) and other obstacles between now and then (Intersessional, GNSO Council Strategic Planning Session), may I suggest that we schedule a call next week to discuss our response?

Best wishes, Ayden

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Data Protection and Privacy Update: Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Compliance Models
> Local Time: 13 January 2018 7:40 PM
> UTC Time: 13 January 2018 18:40
> From: farzaneh.badii at GMAIL.COM
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>
> Please see the CEO blog on Data protection and privacy:
>
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-and-privacy-update-seeking-community-feedback-on-proposed-compliance-modelshttps://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-and-privacy-update-seeking-community-feedback-on-proposed-compliance-models
>
> We should understand these models, discuss them and provide feedback.
>
> Best
> Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20180114/ca94e7bf/attachment.htm>