IGF Brazil - we were approved! - 1 out 3 but still...

[Gustavo Paiva]

That's great news, Renata! I am eager to see all of you in november.

Em 4 de out de 2017 18:01, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Dear all
>
> Incredibly NCUC proposal on a workshop on dot-amazon was approved for IGF
> Brazil
> This proposal also counts w/ NCSG members
>
> Unfortunately the other 2 proposals which just had members
> participating and other organizations were not approved.
> I have already booked an auditorium in the city for rejected. Details to
> follow.
>
> "Água mole em pedra dura tanto bate até que fura" -
> Constant dripping wears away stone - A Brazilian proverb
>
> Below the proposal and comments from evaluators and approval email
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JrkZ56p0AqTMb6D2mgfqTXODlp3ti
> K6jwNpqGosaOtw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Thanks and congrats to all members who contributed
>
> very good proposal, no problems
>
> very good proposal, should be accepted under any conditions
>
> Relevant and current topic, with clear and tangible results. Excellent
> selection of debaters, observing gender equity. However, due to the
> large number of speakers, it is unlikely that the debate will be
> concluded in 90 minutes, as described. I suggest changing the format
> or decreasing the number of speakers.
>
> * Relevance - interesting to give visibility to the theme from the
> emblematic case .amazon;
>
> * Quality - proponents are aware of the theme and the issues at stake;
>
> * Diversity - balanced table from the point of view of gender and with
> people qualified for the theme in the different sectors;
>
> * Format - The aquarium format is interesting, but must be
> well-mediated to allow for a greater number of submissions.
>
> good proposal but with a few problems
>
>  good proposal, it should be accepted less excessive competition;
>
> New gTLDs are still widely scattered to specialized forums and very
> specific groups of individuals. While it is relevant to bring this
> discussion into the national context, I do not believe that the
> proposal specifically addresses this problem.
> The discussion on the new first-level domain name "Amazon point",
> although controversial, does not extrapolate specialized forums.
>
> The proponents of the session could have used that moment to actually
> engage the debate on relevant issues, beyond the "Whom it belongs to."
> It failed to explain the relevance of the topic, from the point of
> view of the domain name market and on the effects of the management of
> this use of domain by a private entity vs governments of the Amazon
> region. Although we have the presence of a governmental member with
> vast knowledge in the area, what is the real impact of this discussion
> on public Internet policies in Brazil or other countries in the Amazon
> region? What is the interest of the business sector of this region in
> .Amazon? What are the uses and bad uses? The controversy has not been
> put in a way that engages people who do not know what ICANN does or
> even what the GAC is - and these are the people to engage.
> Finally, the methodology of fishbowl was not well explained,
> especially the dynamics of operation and the final steps of this
> discussion.
>
> very good proposal, it should be accepted under any conditions
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Internet Forum 2017 <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
> Date: 2017-10-04 17:30 GMT-03: 00
> Subject: Your Internet Forum 2017 paper 177125
> To: raquino at gmail.com
>
>
> Dear Proposer
>
> Congratulations. Your workshop proposal "Who owns .Amazon?
> are top-level geographic domain names and how to participate
> ICANN decisions "submitted to the 7th Internet
> Brazil, was accepted.
>
> Evaluations of your proposal can be found in URL Comments were
> and can help you to perfect the workshop.
>
> Soon the organization of the VII Internet Forum in Brazil will
> contact you with more logistical information.
>
> We wish the workshop very successful.
>
> The Evaluation Committee
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Forum da Internet 2017 <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
> Date: 2017-10-04 17:30 GMT-03:00
> Subject: Your Forum da Internet 2017 paper 177125
> To: raquino at gmail.com
>
>
> Prezado(a) proponente
>
> Congratulações. Sua proposta de workshop "A quem pertence .Amazon? O que
> são nomes de domínio geográficos de primeiro nível e como participar
> destas decisões na ICANN", submetida para o VII Fórum da Internet no
> Brasil, foi aceita.
>
> As avaliações de sua proposta podem ser encontradas em URL Comentários
> foram
> anexados às avaliações e podem ajudá-lo(a) a aperfeiçoar o workshop.
>
> Em breve a organização do VII Fórum da Internet no Brasil entrará em
> contato com você com mais informações logísticas.
>
> Desejamos muito sucesso na realização do workshop.
>
> A Comissão de Avaliação
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20171004/4b8c5ea9/attachment.htm>