Questions to the Board in ICANN60

[Olévié Kouami]

Greetings all from Meritah#West Africa/ Togo.
While following up this discussion, I would like to add that NPOC is the
youngest constituency within the ICANN ecosysytem. One thing among many
others I'm observing in ICANN world is the process of permanent review of
PDPs.
Personnaly, I found this moment to earlier to mesure and evaluate the
impact of what has changed in the Ombudsman functioning position and the
community behaviour. Anyway as a leader must be previsible, I join my voice
once again to support Raoul and Ayden questions.
Warm regards
Olevie
Cheers !
Le 2 oct. 2017 18:58, "Kathy Kleiman" <kathy at kathykleiman.com> a écrit :

> Tapani, I've got one more:
>
> Why should the Consumer Safeguards Director be asking the Community what
> he should be doing when the bounds and boundaries of ICANN's scope and
> mission are clear (e.g., not content)?   What happens when this
> conversation, because it is taking place in so many different corners of
> ICANN, does not have the Noncommercial Stakeholder Groups voice and
> concerns at one meeting, e.g., one webinar. Is this noncommercial voice now
> waived and these concerns buried or lost?
>
> All, please free to edit and expand!
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
> On 10/2/2017 12:31 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>
>> Absent other suggestions I'm going to send Ayden's and Raoul's
>> questions to the Board. I've rephrased and abbreviated them somewhat
>> (intent being they should fit on the screen at once). Feel free to
>> comment, or even still suggest alternative questions, but please
>> be quick - deadline being over I intend to send these tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> (1) After the harassment incident in Hyderabad ICANN has adopted
>> new Standards of Behaviour and new community anti-harassment policy.
>>
>> How satisfied is the board are with the effectiveness of these
>> measures, particularly in those instances where complaints have been
>> filed with the Office of the Ombudsman and how is the Board monitoring
>> the performance of the Office of the Ombudsman to ensure that
>> harassment complaints filed are being appropriately handled?
>>
>>
>> (2) For historical reasons that no longer matter, constituencies
>> within Commercial Stakeholder Group appoint a total of four members to
>> the Nominating Committee (Business Community two, others one each),
>> whereas in Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group only NCUC appoints one,
>> NPOC none. Consequently there are four CSG appointees and only one
>> NCSG appointee in the NomCom.
>>
>> Could the Board to something to redress this long-standing problem
>> and how soon could we hope it to happen?
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20171002/ef5967ac/attachment.htm>