[NCSG-PC] African DNS market Study NCSG comment / Call for comments

Tue May 9 10:15:27 EEST 2017

Hi All,
Firstly, I am excited that NSCG statement or comment opportunities, Dorothy
has done a great job so far. Thank you
I am also glad that this study was done, and I believe it will be a
reference point for future studies or surveys for Domain Name market in
Africa.
The reports give a good indication of the dependencies of  IXPs presences
on Internet growth in each country in Africa, the report did not highlight
why there are limited numbers of IXPs.

It will be interesting to also highlight why many domain names are not
hosted on the continent, I believe the report can highlight the
availability of power (electricity) as a major factor.

The survey response or circulation show the level of ICANN participation or
awareness on the continent, there is still a lot more space to cover.

This is my initial reaction and thought,
Thank you,
Benjamin

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Olévié Kouami <olivierkouami at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all !!
>
> +1 @Dorothy and +1 @Arsene.
>
> During this first time study in Africa region, there were many DNSSEC
> roadshows organized accross the continent. In my humble opinion, it was a
> great opportunity offer to the SACF and its team to jointly organized a
> "DNS market study roadshows" too. But we lack of it.
> I hope that, we will get another occasion to do it for the next time.
>
> My 2 cents.
> -Olevie-
>
>
> 2017-05-08 13:37 GMT+00:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
>
>> On language, the survey was distributed in the more widely spoken
>> languages of the region (including French, Arabic, and Portuguese), but it
>> was not circulated in any local languages. I am not sure if this is
>> problematic, because the target audience of the questionnaire was not the
>> average Internet user, but a telecommunications regulator, domain name
>> registrar, etc. It would be useful if someone was to examine the respondent
>> demographics among those polled and who returned the survey so that we
>> could better understand which voices were present and which were missing.
>> Maybe this is covered in the report; I only skimmed it. Thanks again for
>> drafting the comment, Dorothy.
>>
>> - Ayden
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] African DNS market Study NCSG comment / Call for
>> comments
>> Local Time: May 8, 2017 8:21 AM
>> UTC Time: May 8, 2017 7:21 AM
>> From: arsenebaguma at GMAIL.COM
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>
>> I do agree with you, Dorothy on the last point and as you mentionned
>> in the comments. To give a better view and allow rationale
>> conclusions, it would be great if they can share information on the
>> countries that responded and those who didn't. This type of info can
>> help explain/justify the 22% responses received.
>>
>> Also, I don't know in which form we can raise the issue of language
>> barrier here, the lenght of the questionnaire, the poor distribution
>> of the study as some of the barriers leading to the the poor responses
>> received.
>>
>> This study was done across Africa but there was little advertisement
>> around it, it was even poorly spoken about during regional or local
>> ICT events. I am sure they would have had enough budget to even
>> organize or fund some local events in specific countries or regions at
>> least to gather inputs from different African regions on the study.
>>
>> If we can include such aspects in our comments, they might probably
>> improve their future exercises.
>>
>> 2017-05-08 6:53 UTC+02:00, dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com>:
>> > I would agree with you that 22% is not a bad response rate given the
>> > complexity of the questionnaire and in fact the pathbreaking nature of
>> the
>> > exercise. However it does impact the ability to draw conclusions from
>> the
>> > analysis of the questionnaire responses. Also as the authors of the
>> report
>> > say themselves they realised after the fact that they could have
>> shortened
>> > the questionnaire. I think that if they create the country profiles and
>> > these reflect where data was not available due to non-response maybe
>> that
>> > will encourage an improved response rate for future exercises.
>> > best
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thank you so much for taking the lead here, Dorothy, and drafting this
>> >> comment.
>> >>
>> >> I am wondering, is a 22% response rate really considered low?
>> Considering
>> >> the length of the survey (200+ questions), limited languages (it was
>> not
>> >> translated into local ones), the specialised level of knowledge
>> required
>> >> to
>> >> respond to the questions, and the medium through which it was
>> distributed
>> >> (online only, circulated via email) I am thinking hearing back from 22%
>> >> of
>> >> the 1,400 people/organisations sent the questionnaire perhaps it isn't
>> >> too
>> >> bad. Maybe we should ask, are the responses that came in broadly
>> >> representative of everyone polled? If not - and, full disclosure, I
>> >> haven't
>> >> looked at the data so I don't know if this is the case - maybe we
>> should
>> >> draw attention to that.
>> >>
>> >> Best wishes,
>> >>
>> >> Ayden
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -------- Original Message --------
>> >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] African DNS market Study NCSG comment / Call for
>> >> comments
>> >> Local Time: May 5, 2017 10:40 AM
>> >> UTC Time: May 5, 2017 9:40 AM
>> >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> >> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>> >> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Dororthy kindly drafted a NCSG comment ( https://docs.google.com/docu
>> >> ment/d/1ee3gKApsPyKqDE70GSmTjxbxl0DejNLV3Jfry4dAt1Y/edit. ) about the
>> >> African DNS Market Study (https://www.icann.org/public-
>> >> comments/africa-dns-market-study-2017-03-11-en)
>> >>
>> >> While the dealdine is for the 5th May, I already sent a request to the
>> >> ICANN staff telling them that we are going to make a late submission
>> and
>> >> asking for extension. I would like to ask members and in particular
>> those
>> >> from Africa to go through the draft in google doc for review and
>> >> comments.
>> >> We should submit this comment by next week after NCSG Policy Committee
>> >> endorsment based on members feebdack here and in the document.
>> >> It will be great of you can make comments and any suggestion for edits
>> by
>> >> Tuesday 9th May so we can resolve them before submission.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> Rafik
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ===================================================
>> >>
>> >> Draft 2016 African Domain Name System Market Study
>> >> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/africa-dns-market-stu
>> dy-2017-03-11-en>
>> >> (ADNSMS)
>> >>
>> >> The NCSG welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Draft 2016 African
>> >> Domain Name Market Study carried out by a consortium led by the South
>> >> Africa Communications Forum.
>> >>
>> >> Methodology
>> >>
>> >> This is a first attempt to present a snapshot of the African Domain
>> Name
>> >> Market. The report sets out clearly the data challenges that hampered
>> >> analysis in conducting this baseline survey. The study indicates that
>> >> poor
>> >> response levels (22% to the online survey) could have been affected by
>> >> the
>> >> length of the questionnaire, and the difficulty in getting responses
>> for
>> >> the full set of six specifically targeted questionnaires registrar,
>> >> regulator etc per country. The report’s authors note that the survey
>> >> questionnaire could have been streamlined. A Country DNS success index
>> >> was
>> >> developed by the authors to rank the health of African DNS markets.
>> >>
>> >> Comment: 1. It would be good if the report made reference to other
>> >> criteria for benchmarking used in other regions to support the choice
>> of
>> >> the criteria used in the DNS success index.
>> >>
>> >> 2. Full discussion of the methodological deficiencies and
>> >> lessons learnt should be included in an annex to support the next
>> >> iteration
>> >> of the (ADNSMS)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Section 5 - Africa Rising
>> >>
>> >> Comment:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 1.
>> >>
>> >> In order to make cross-country comparisons more realistic it may be
>> >> useful to look at the size of a given country’s economy and population
>> >> in
>> >> comparison to its existing DNS market. This is done for webpages on
>> >> pages
>> >> 85 & 86.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2. Much of the information in this section can be found in other
>> sources
>> >> and could be put in annex. The slimmed down version included in the
>> main
>> >> report could focus on ‘value addition’ to the main arguments and make
>> use
>> >> of the excellent summative graphics some of which are striking in their
>> >> originality.
>> >>
>> >> Section 6 Key Features of the African DNS Market
>> >>
>> >> Comment:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 1.
>> >>
>> >> This section provides useful background information but it could
>> >> benefit from some more rigor in making its economic arguments. These
>> >> include the analysis of demand (section 6.3) and the valuation of the
>> >> African DNS industry (section 6.5) . In the first instance more
>> >> specific
>> >> cases should be given to support the arguments given for changes that
>> >> would
>> >> increase demand e.g. improved local hosting infrastructure. In the
>> >> second
>> >> instance valuing simply on the prices that have been fixed for service
>> >> does
>> >> not take into account the multiplier effects within the economy. Given
>> >> the
>> >> advice to drop prices and the lack of evidence of the resulting
>> >> increase in
>> >> uptake in all country markets, the current approach could result in
>> >> reduced
>> >> valuation. This is just to point out that the approach may benefit from
>> >> a
>> >> review.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 1.
>> >>
>> >> The detailed information on certain countries is one of the best
>> >> features of this study. It may be useful to present a country profile
>> >> for
>> >> each African country, a kind of summary flash card that would allow us
>> >> to
>> >> appreciate where information is lacking and which indicators will need
>> >> to
>> >> be tracked in each context.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Section 7. Analysis of Domain Name Uptake Across the region
>> >>
>> >> (see prior comment on methodology)
>> >>
>> >> Comment:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 1.
>> >>
>> >> Please see above request for country profiles for all countries
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 1.
>> >>
>> >> The table presenting the rankings in section 7.2 should be
>> >> repositioned as it is currently split between 2 pages.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Section 8 Key success factors registries
>> >>
>> >> Section 9 - Growth Outlook
>> >>
>> >> The part of this study that needs to be given more substance relates to
>> >> the business models that will grow the African Domain Name System
>> Market.
>> >> It is important that the study includes an in-depth treatment of this
>> >> linked to key factors at the country context.
>> >>
>> >> The observatory is clearly necessary but the terms of reference for the
>> >> study not only focused on the observation of what is happening but the
>> >> deliberate intervention to speed growth. The study lists out factors
>> >> but
>> >> these are not put in the form of business models adapted to specific
>> >> starting points.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> “The goal of this study is to identify and define the strengths and
>> >> weaknesses in the industry ecosystem within the Africa region and
>> develop
>> >> recommendations on how to advance the industry and bring it closer to
>> the
>> >> opportunities available.” From Section 1 in the ICANN request for
>> >> comment.
>> >>
>> >> Overall the study is an impressive piece of work given the void it
>> comes
>> >> to fill. It should inspire many others to systematic research on these
>> >> issues.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> >> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> >> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------
>> **Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
>> Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international
>> <http://www.rudiinternational.org>*,
>> CEO,* Smart Services Sarl <http://www.smart-serv.info>*, *Mabingwa Forum
>> <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com>*
>> Tel: +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967>
>> GPG: 523644A0
>> *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*
>>
>> 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow
>> <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mande
>> la-washington.html>
>> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil
>> <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-lea
>> dership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-
>> programme/Past-Ambassadors>
>> & Mexico
>> <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-lea
>> dership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>)
>> - AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger
>> <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN Fellow (Los Angeles
>> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-07-18-en> & Marrakech
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/marrakech55-attendees
>> -2016-03-14-en>
>> ). AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius
>> <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fell
>> owship-winners>)*
>> - *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet
>> Freedom.
>>
>> Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report (English
>> <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French
>> <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI*
> Consultant & Formateur Senior en T.I.C.
> Directeur Général de la société GIDA_OKTETS (SSII)
> <http://www.intic4dev.org/*>Promoteur de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut ds TIC
> pour le développement)
> Membre du Conseil d'Administration du FOSSFA (http://www.fossfa.net)
> *Eminent National Expert for the World Summit Award  (
> http://www.wsis-award.org) - *Secrétaire Général de l'ESTETIC  -
> Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (http://www.estetic.tg <
> http://www.estetic.tg>)*
> Membre de l'Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org) - Membre de l'ICANN (
> http://www.icann.org) - Membre fondateur du RIK-Togo (Réseau
> Interprofessionnel du Karité au Togo) *(http://www.globalshea.com)
> *Skype : olevie1   FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.7 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé –
> Togo*
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170509/cb6d7b7f/attachment.htm>