The anti-harassment policy

[James Gannon]

Quick note, when we were drafting our statement on this I brought up the fact that a new office or set of resources was never going to be realistic for the organization to create for these situations.
While we can agree that yes it would be better to have a separate function that realistically and commercially that was not going to be an option.

-James

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Corinne Cath
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 12:23 AM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: The anti-harassment policy

Thanks for sharing, Farzi. It is great that it passed. But perhaps someone can elaborate how the Ombudsperson has (again) become the main mediator in the event of (alleged) harassment? Especially, after we had long conversations on the list about finding alternatives to such a centralized solution. See: http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2016-November/019562.html

Best,

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:14 PM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi


ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy and Terms of Participation and Complaint Procedure
is posted:  https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/community-anti-harassment-policy-2017-03-24-en

Farzaneh



--
Corinne J.N. Cath
Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute

Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath<http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath>
Email: ccath at turing.ac.uk<mailto:ccath at turing.ac.uk> & corinnecath at gmail.com<mailto:corinnecath at gmail.com>
Twitter: @C_Cath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170328/81d6a3de/attachment.htm>