Requirements for information about speakers and participants for ICANN60 in Abu Dhabi

[James Gannon]

I
would go so far as to recommend that for countries with human rights
issues, digital or otherwise, if and when ICANN reaches what it
considers as a satisfactory arrangement, there is an understanding that
during the event none of ICANN’s constituency groups will publicly, or
in collaboration with local groups, engage in activities that challenge
human rights record and policies of the local government.

Hey Sam,

This would fly in the face of most if not the vast majority of NCUCs mission and outreach, these are the groups and peoples that we say we are here to engage with and support and advocate for.


-James

________________________________
From: NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> on behalf of Sam Lanfranco <lanfran at YORKU.CA>
Sent: 28 June 2017 23:13:35
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: Requirements for information about speakers and participants for ICANN60 in Abu Dhabi

Constituency Colleagues,

The subject of human rights and, in particular, the rights of digital
citizenship in countries hosting ICANN meetings, is both the elephant
and the gorilla (the unspoken issues) in ICANN Conference venue
discussions.  Without going into specifics, in the past several years
ICANN has held its conferences in countries where, while ICANN was
meeting, governments were exercising extreme control over their
citizenry’s access to the Internet and cell phone service.

What is absolutely clear is that ICANN should have venue criteria that
are sensitive to these issues, and these are issues that should be
raised in all ICANN venue selection discussions.

What is also absolutely clear is that such issues should be raised and
addressed prior to the selection of a venue. The subsequent ICANN event
should not be used as a platform for raising country specific issues. I
would go so far as to recommend that for countries with human rights
issues, digital or otherwise, if and when ICANN reaches what it
considers as a satisfactory arrangement, there is an understanding that
during the event none of ICANN’s constituency groups will publicly, or
in collaboration with local groups, engage in activities that challenge
human rights record and policies of the local government.

This is not because governments should not be challenged on their
record, and it is not because local groups should not be supported. It
is also not just because these issues should be sorted out prior to
venue selection. It is because delegates to ICANN meetings are in a
privileged position, and while public displays would probably not put
delegates at risk, they would put local collaborators at risk,
especially after ICANN has left the scene.

Sam Lanfranco

------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
  邦有道，贫且贱焉，耻也。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170629/a1ade2e4/attachment.htm>