two letter domain names and GAC
Seun Ojedeji
seun.ojedeji at GMAIL.COM
Sat Jul 1 02:07:24 EEST 2017
Interesting that this is generalised as "pronounce" but it seem to me that
they are specific on the respective 2 letter (and 3 letters) country codes,
and one may argue that there seem to be a logic to that regard.
Will be interesting to see how it goes.
Regards
On Jun 30, 2017 2:35 PM, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> I wrote about two-letter domain names around a year ago http://www.
> internetgovernance.org/2016/08/26/another-government-land-
> grab-in-the-name-space/
>
> It seems like some in GAC do not back off on this issue and now I found
> out that there will be a task force on this issue according to GAC
> communique.
>
> 1. 2-Character Country Codes at the Second Level With respect to the
>> 2-Character Country Codes at the Second Level GAC Copenhagen Communiqué
>> Advice (para VI.4), the GAC;
>> a) welcomes and appreciates the decision made by ICANN Board directing
>> the President and CEO of ICANN or his designee(s) to take necessary actions
>> for satisfactory resolution of the concerns raised in that Advice;
>>
>> and b) welcomes the announcement made by the President and CEO of ICANN
>> of his intention to create a task force to resolve the concerns mentioned
>> in the above communiqué. In this regard the GAC proposes that the mandate
>> and working methods of the above mentioned Task Force be determined in
>> consultation with GAC leadership and GAC members, and other interested
>> parties.
>
>
> We have to be on this task force. There is no legitimate reason for
> governments to claim ownership over pronouns and other generic two letter
> domain names. Do I need permission from Italy to register it.sucks? Also I
> am uneasy that they created a task force which relates to generic names
> (pronouns, remember) and GNSO is not even mentioned.
>
>
>
> Best
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170701/63d59349/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list