[NCUC-DISCUSS] My views on the supplementary rules for the Independent Review Process

[farzaneh badii]

Hi everyone,

Since the deadline for this public comment is fast approaching (25th
January), I suggest to comment on it  by 20th January
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TMI2n_EgBDVTSUZm2Xwl
7SSHWks9Hz076NQGfsXxqso/edit?usp=sharing, we will resolve the issues and
then submit it to NCSG PC for approval.

Best

Farzaneh

Farzaneh

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:26 PM, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:

> On 11-Jan-17 10:50, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> > your comments will not be taken into account by the implementation
> > team unless they are submitted to the public comment forum
>
> They probably will if they are known, But  you are right, it is good to
> submit through the formal source, though sending a pointer to the blog
> (or even the text) in a message may be good enough at times.  To the
> point, in today's IRP meeting we ack'ed both your and Kathy's comments
> and listed the issues among those we need to work on after the comment
> period ends. These issues have been discussed before, incidentally, it
> is just that the pre-comment period consensus fell were it did.  So it
> is good to have the comments to work with.
>
> There were some disagreement between support staff and the group on
> including those blogs in the staff comment summary write-up, but no
> question in the group that we would pay attention to them.
>
> Still I endorse the advice to send the comments in.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170117/f37da4cb/attachment.htm>