[NCUC-DISCUSS] My views on the supplementary rules for the Independent Review Process

[Paul Rosenzweig]

FYI, I plan to file comments echoing most of what Milton is saying here.  I agree that it is a critical problem that needs to be highlighted for change in the public comment period and I encourage everyone on the list to engage as strongly and as vocally as they feel comfortable doing.

 

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> 

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

www.redbranchconsulting.com <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> 

My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684> &search=0x9A830097CA066684

 

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Edward Morris
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 9:10 PM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] My views on the supplementary rules for the Independent Review Process

 

Hi Milton,

 

Thanks very much for this blog post. In our rush to meet deadlines I'm not sure we thought through clearly enough some of the specifics of our accountability mechanisms. We've changed the nature of the IRP from being an arbitration device to being a quasi-constututional court. Yet in areas like statutes of limitations we've kept rules more applicable to commercial arbitration proceedings than to the new broadened remit of the IRP.

 

An extraordinarily well done and important blog post. Public comments are due on 25 January for the IRP Supplemental Procedures report. Hopefully we can get multiple comments submitted by NCSG members.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Ed Morris

 

 

 

  _____  

From: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu <mailto:milton at gatech.edu> >
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 8:48 PM
To: "ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org> " <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org> >
Cc: "NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> " <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> >
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] My views on the supplementary rules for the Independent Review Process 

 

This blog post takes a seemingly legalistic and obscure set of rules and shows how it is very important for the ICANN accountability reforms. My comments are intended to help NCSG develop public comments on the IRP rules, hope people can follow up. We still have time to fix the problem if we act. http://www.internetgovernance.org/2017/01/07/putting-your-rights-on-the-clock-the-irp-supplementary-rules/ Dr. Milton L Mueller Professor, School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology Internet Governance Project http://internetgovernance.org/ _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss mailing list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>  http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170110/a9086fd0/attachment.htm>