Questionable ICANN statistics

[dorothy g]

This is serious as this kind of data generation/analytics should be managed
by not very complicated software. It will be very interesting to find out
why this is not working.
best

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:34 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Send a note to Goran
>
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 02:09, Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM
> <icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>
> See this email exchange
> <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atlarge-review-wp/2017-February/000374.html>.
> ICANN staff claimed a public document on the ICANN website had been
> downloaded zero times since it was uploaded. A member of the At-Large
> community corrected the record, noting that they had downloaded that file
> several times. I too had downloaded it. So it seems we should be very
> careful taking ICANN at its word when it comes to statistics. I cannot help
> but think back to last week at the Intersessional when the SVP Contractual
> Compliance and Consumer Safeguards spoke about how the Compliance pages
> were the most visited on the ICANN website. I hate to be so cynical, but
> maybe the analytics function just doesn't work — like much of the ICANN
> website?
>
> - Ayden
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20170223/1682c3c3/attachment.htm>